Hi Will
Dawn's right in her assessment of chaos so I shan't repeat. Nonetheless those are three very good photos.
I really like the photo for clutter. Simple and fits in with the theme very well.
Hi Will, I like this image and it made me think, especially with your explanation. Individually the three pics work well with each being very well executed. Good lighting, DOF, sharpness and composition. You've done well with the white backgrounds - what did you use
As a triptych I could see something like this accompanying a magzine article about the subject you've discussed. For me it works as an image. I would have been tempted to try using paper money rather than coins as that might fit with your idea better (although most of us don't have piles of £20 notes lying around!).
I also really like your previous weeks too - lots of very striking images. The "delicate" shot of the lightbulb stands out for me.
Great 52
Hi Will,
Some nice shots from your DIY studio.
I'm liking the 'new' and 'clutter' shots.
I'm sat here looking at a grey and dull day and your thread has inspired me to add to my own DIY studio rather than going out and getting cold! Your link to SteveBlackDog'd Flickr has some good tips, and also gives me a good excuse to eat some Pringles!
Hi, Will, you've done really well considering. I like the perspective which adds to the depth. Good dof and I actually like the staircase, kind of adds to the feeling that Concorde is becoming a museum piece...very sad.
Cropping across and removing the grass at the bottom seems to add to the depth??
I'd like to see a b&w version.
Cheers.
Hiya Will,
Great take on the theme and lucky for you to be able to take such a shot.
I think your processing has worked just as you described your idea for it.
What I like most about the angle at which you have taken this photo is that is shows the scale of how large this plane is compared to all the other things around it like the fence, etc.
Sad indeed that such a powerful machine should be laid to rest.
Cheers
Dawn
The reduced tonal range is appropriate and I feel the b&w would do the same but with infinitely less subtlety.
A great depiction of finish. A great shame that this magnificent machine is no longer in the skies (though it once was responsible for the near death of my daughter, but that is a another story )
I think the square and solid steps add to the feel that this bird will no longer fly, so whilst you might have initially wanted to exclude them I feel their significance completes the composition as does the confining chainlink fence.
I agree with Andy that the strip of grass in the foreground could be lost with nothing but advantage to the image.
The reduced tonal range is appropriate and I feel the b&w would do the same but with infinitely less subtlety.
On my (crappy, but appreciated) laptop I wasn't sure if it was selective colouring or not.
It actually looks better on second viewing.
Cheers.
A great image, it's hard to believe it is that long ago! Your processing works well indeed.
great shot of a great plane
Hi Will
love your shot of Concord & much prefer your original version .The slight areas of color work really well
What a sad end for a magnificent machine. I really like your shot. The angle is great.
The crop works well, but not sure about the mono conversion - the bits of colour add interest..
It's great pic, but if there had been a person in the frame it would have helped give a sense of scale.
It's a nice angle from what sounds like restricted options.
Nice take on the theme.
Prefer version II
Was there anyway you could have got an angle that could have shown more the distinctive nose shape of this plane?
James,
I like the idea and the effort you've put in.
However, and this may be real picky, I'd rather the blue and red shots were taken from the same angle.
The blue appears to be from below the glass rim and the red appears to be above the glass rim.
You've got some shadows and light spots on your back grounds, which I'm not sure are intentional.
As above, these are what I tried to get rid of using photoshop but due to my complete lack of skills I was unable to do effectively But I'm glad my observations are in line with yours so thanks for pointing this out
Can I suggest you add some tracing paper to your studio kit, it's great at defusing light.
Also, check out Linky for a great DIY snoot - I'm off to B&Q today for the rest of the parts, hopefully to test out on my trio this evening!
Thanks for the tips I follow Steve's Flickr quite closely, his stuff is brilliant!
Thanks for the feedback Neil, very grateful!
I like the idea and think you have done really well...
Thanks Jeff .
Will .
Hi Neil,
It's Will (not James!)
Hiya Will,
I like your idea and the colours in your trio shot, well done, especially considering the busy week you have had.
Have to agree with the comments about the symmetry, shadows and lighting that you have already pointed out.
You have taken on quite a challenge with this, so well done to you for attempting it.
Lighting can be tricky to get right, as can be trying to clone shadows etc, especially when you have three photos to compose as a triptych.
A suggestion to get the symmetry right is to mark a spot on the base (card) where you want the glasses to be positioned and then flipping same over and marking the other card with the spots (you could do this using a compass point and a very light pencil marking which shouldn't show up on the image, but at least you would be able to use them as a guide).
I like the way you have the centre glasses lined up, so if you could get the same view angle for the left and right images that would look great.
As for the lighting, that is pretty much trial and error, but I think if you aim for trying to get a reverse of the lighting (easier said than done) then it might help to get the lighting in the right places. Alternatively, why not try positioning the lighting at a further distance and using a longer shutter speed (I find that works sometimes to eliminate reflection and uneven lighting on the background) If I remember correctly, I used a similar technique on my delicate shot.
BTW don't be so hard on yourself, I think you are doing a fantastic job with your photography and have seen a vast improvement over the weeks.
Personally I think the 18-55 lens is under-rated and I have found it a useful lens. Most of my photos are taken using the 18-55 and up until the latter part of last year was the only lens I owned (until I was kindly given a 70-300 lens).
I also maintain that it's not necessarily about the equipment you have; more importantly it's about how you use it! ...... and I think you are doing fine.
What I admire the most is the way you are being inventive with your mini studio setups, and thanks for sharing the information with us as it is always helpful to see how someone has setup to achieve a result.
Keep up the good work and you could alway take this image and do a re-shoot for week 11 as you already have the groundwork and knowledge of how to get the perfect shot. (Plus that way you would be covering the re-shoot and knowledge themes in one).
Good luck too with your learning post processing, you will get there with practice.
Cheers
Dawn
I really like your trio, and totally understand about the amount of time needed for a reshoot.
Cheers for the £20 home studio tips too!!
Sorry Will
I finished my DIY Snoots yesterday.
Just got to find a good tutorial to learn how to use them!
Hi Will, love your trio image. A clever idea which you have executed brilliantly. I could find a few nit-picky things to say, but it's a great and original image.
Interesting to see how you set up the lighting. I always like to peek behind the scenes to see how people do things (and then pinch their ideas)
Patrick