Putting price considerations aside for a moment, I have the opportunity to purchase one of the two new Canon 70-200 zooms: either the f2.8 or the f4. I really can’t decide. Please help me make a decision.
For context, I will be using it mostly for shooting arena/pitch based events such as football, equestrian and athletics. I’m currently using the excellent 70-300, but most of my shots are in the 80 to 120 range so not using the top end of the bigger lens much for this. The weight of the f2.8 is a bit off putting given I’ll be lugging the thing around for several hours at a time, (it’s heavier than the 70-300) so do I really need the extra stop, or will the f4 do me a great job for less energy output and strain on my aging back?. I use a Canon 5D mk2 and generally carry it on a Blackrapid shoulder strap rather than a conventional neck strap which helps with the weight/bad back issue.
Anyone have any experience of these two bits of kit? All advice would be very welcome. Many thanks.
For context, I will be using it mostly for shooting arena/pitch based events such as football, equestrian and athletics. I’m currently using the excellent 70-300, but most of my shots are in the 80 to 120 range so not using the top end of the bigger lens much for this. The weight of the f2.8 is a bit off putting given I’ll be lugging the thing around for several hours at a time, (it’s heavier than the 70-300) so do I really need the extra stop, or will the f4 do me a great job for less energy output and strain on my aging back?. I use a Canon 5D mk2 and generally carry it on a Blackrapid shoulder strap rather than a conventional neck strap which helps with the weight/bad back issue.
Anyone have any experience of these two bits of kit? All advice would be very welcome. Many thanks.