Hardly a deal breaker!
A deal maker might be this......
The 5d3 can do an in-camera hdr merge and still keep the RAW files.
The 6d will do the merge but you lose the RAW files.
Hi
I have just purchased a 6D after a lot of research. I went for the the 6D in preference to 5D's as it was a lot lighter and it was more suited to my level of photography. No good buying a Rolls Royce if you are going to drive it like a mini. Not really had a good play with it yet but I can see already the image quality (particularly in low light) is far superior to my old 600D.
In camera HDR is the worst function on a camera ever, probably the worst "deal breaker" I've ever heard.
In camera HDR is the worst function on a camera ever, probably the worst "deal breaker" I've ever heard.
Worse than direct print?
Sorry I couldn't resist, in camera HDR is almost as pointless as direct print, and slightly more pointless than the built in microphone.
In camera HDR is the worst function on a camera ever, probably the worst "deal breaker" I've ever heard.
No good buying a Rolls Royce if you are going to drive it like a mini.
Worse than direct print?
Sorry I couldn't resist, in camera HDR is almost as pointless as direct print, and slightly more pointless than the built in microphone.
Hi there, not sure about my budget yet but what's the major difference between these cameras?
I have a cropped sensor so would like to upgrade to full frame x
Why do you want to upgrade to a FF camera? What are you shooting and what issues / limitations are you suffering from with the crop body?
Yes.manufactures have to justify their prices somehow
OK, point taken.
Never having used HDR myself I thought it sounded useful.....