cannockwolf said:
Duncan I'd like to know why it is a concern? If I had taken the jpeg off his site and just sent it in to the comp I can see why, but I drove there, got up early and took the shot processed it myself, in a totally different manner as they are not the same, and sent my picture to a competition, what is the problem with that?
Do I really deserve the slagging off that a small few have given me? Really?
Dave (if I may be so familiar), I appreciate your reply and I do agree that you don't deserve any abuse or slagging. You have done nothing 'wrong'. As you say those boats are well shot (and yours and Peter's shots far eclipse my efforts by far) and you are entirely entitled to shoot them.
Indeed, there is little that any of us could describe as truly original, most shots (esp in UK) are in some way derivative unless we genuinely go out of our way to make them. Most of us see an image, want to mimic or take elements from that image, be in the same place as that image, etc
I don't think anyone doubts you, your image or its worthiness - and it IS gorgeous lest that be missed - and I don't think you really have a case to answer, should you feel otherwise under 'attack'.
However I am sure that you understand that the competition and its reputation is at stake if there is an obvious case of replication. I appreciate your moves to distance your image from Peter's but there is very little to separate them and the original comment on your website acknowledged that it was derivative of his shot, regardless of time between them.
For my own part, I submitted an I image of Buachaille Etive Mòr, one of the biggest clichés in the UK. Had I won (and your image is light years beyond mine!) I would be obliged to accept it was derivative of so many shots that went before and probably in the same tripods holes. Indeed I expected it to be rejected on such grounds, and similar shots likewise in the hope of uncovering something new.
I agree that being a victim of 'abuse' is unwarranted. I expect like many you submitted images to the competition in hope more than expectation and being thrust into the limelight with such questions to answer was unexpected and unwarranted.
Ultimately the competition and it's organisers hold responsibility - there is nothing to say you shouldn't submit such an image. Yet if they purport to represent the finest, original and pinnacle of UK landscape photography then with that comes a certain understanding that it should be truly unique and moving landscape photography forward.
As such entrants have an expectation that winners fit that mould. You yourself admitted it was the same as a camera club member's and a shot made thousands of times over. The question raised is is a 'very much shot image' what LPOY is looking for as it's winner? Perhaps, but not by it's advertising. Do you feel that your image represents the pinnacle of UK Landscape Photography?
Again I love your image and congratulations on your win (accomplished in good faith so beyond recourse) and I don't come to pick an argument only to suggest those that are otherwise deemed 'bitter' are not unjustified.
And again, I genuinely love the image!
(ps I don't think Alex's point was about walking days and wild camping, and lovely as I find some of his images - which I do! - I don't think they necessarily represent what LPOY should be looking for either. And so perhaps the key point is 'what is the competition looking for?' as that decrees success)