And what bright spark decided to give small apertures big numbers and vice versa?
And what bright spark decided to give small apertures big numbers and vice versa?
'Sunny 16 rule'
I live in Manchester, so am not familiar with the term 'sunny' This rule should be called the 'overcast and drizzle f4 rule'.
And what bright spark decided to give small apertures big numbers and vice versa?
And why is it shutter speed when the shutter always moves at the same speed :shrug:
I know that Canon use that term but how many people say " I used f4 at a Tv of 1/125th seconds" ?That is why Tv was used by some (Time Value) to denote it.
Lens No. of Bokehs
------------------
kit lens -10
50mm 1.8 8
24-70mm 22
135mm 2.0 42
85mm 1.2 99
50mm 1.0 off the scale
Code:Lens [B]No. of Bokehs[/B] ------------------ kit lens -10 50mm 1.8 8 24-70mm 22 135mm 2.0 42 85mm 1.2 99 50mm 1.0 off the scale
One more thing whilst I'm ranting, use of the word "bokehlicious" drives me nuts! :bonk:
Only one person uses that silly word, and that's Kai. And he's silly in general.
One more thing whilst I'm ranting, use of the word "bokehlicious" drives me nuts! :bonk:
For me it's the word "bokeh". Not that it's misleading or unhelpful, but it's rarely used correctly. And more annoyingly, it's seen as some sort of holy grail to get "more of it". I once heard someone ask if there was some sort of chart that showed how much bokeh each lens makes. Come to think of it, that would be pretty helpful!
I thought bokeh was some sort of Japanese sexual deviation until I bought a nifty.
For me the most generally unhelpful phrase in photography is "manual exposure", "shooting in manual" or any other iteration of the meaning.
People would have a much healthier appreciation of the technique if it were termed "fixed exposure" or something.
And using AV and TV to denote them is a quate narrf.......quate..
That is why Tv was used by some (Time Value) to denote it.
Tog and nifty..... Grrrrrrr
....
And what bright spark decided to give small apertures big numbers and vice versa?
It took me forever to get my head around that little gem out :bonk:
If bokeh is used to describe the pleasing blur of out of focus areas in a photo, why are people purposely taking out of focus shots to get bokeh?
If it's not background blur but just a lack of focal pint is is still bokeh?
Professional.