- Messages
- 2,993
- Name
- Dan
- Edit My Images
- No
... If you think a 5D mkIII (I own one) produces noticeable noise (at pretty much any ISO value) then you want your head feeling.
Hmmm. [Makes note] Owns 5D3 and into phrenology ...
... If you think a 5D mkIII (I own one) produces noticeable noise (at pretty much any ISO value) then you want your head feeling.
So you've been doing weddings for 10 years and only now, with today's cameras which deliver superclean images at stupidly high ISOs, you suddenly have an issue with noise? With 10 years of experience that's bonkers, as is your client management to be honest. If your client is wondering why the ceremony shots are in black-and-white then all you have to do is say "it's normal practice to provide ceremony and reception photographs in black-and-white whenever we encounter particularly low light conditions, or the effects of mixed interior lighting which can cause conflicting colour shifts within colour photographs. For this reason conversion to monochrome is deemed to produce the most pleasing results. For explanatory purposes I have attached a sample in colour".
*manfully resists the urge to make a smutty remark*then you want your head feeling.
D.O.M.
given the equipment in use. I've shot in dark churches with the original 5D and 40D as did pretty much every other wedding photographer back then, .
I find discussion of needing mega high ISOs laughable. My father shot thousands of weddings on ISO 160 (and sometimes 400) film. If there was no need to use ISOs in the thousands back then, there's no need now.
Steve.
Correct, and in the good old days of film we shot far fewer photographs and there were far fewer restrictions on the use of flash.
Nah. Plates in a mahogany and brass field camera for steampunk weddings.