Excellent capture Jeff well done
GEORGE.
Wow, you seriously need to think about how you offer crit.It's comments like this that have ruined this Section. The picture is clearly not excellent and your comments George, I have to say are pretty pointless. If that's what you class as an excellent image then you have a lot to learn.
While the detail on the bird is ok the composition is very poor, it needs more space to the left and although I appreciate the bird was at the angle shown it would, imo, look a lot better straightened a good bit.
As for the PP,, I have no idea what on earth you think of when processing your images. This dire effort at selective colour has simply made an at best average pic into complete amateurish mess imo. Your processing here has added nothing to the overall photograph
You really need to think about what you are trying to achieve and not just process the life out of an image for the sake it if you wish to improve. If you are happy to glory on accepting comments such as Georges then fair enough but you ain't gonna take your photography to the next level.
Wow, you seriously need to think about how you offer crit.
There is a way of speaking the truth without being rude. I didn't say that your crit was wrong - it's your delivery.Why? It's honest crit as I see it. Tell me I'm wrong or offer something yourself instead of slagging my comments.
I've offered advice on composition and PP etc, stated the detail on the bird was favourable (albeit there is room for improvement) so as far as I'm concerned it was constructive.
Sometimes, particularly on here, folk don't like the truth, stark as it sometimes may be.
There is a way of speaking the truth without being rude. I didn't say that your crit was wrong - it's your delivery.
You've managed to insult George without knowing anything about his level of expertise and virtually every word you wrote to the OP could have been worded so that it doesn't make them feel like they might as well dump the camera in a lake. There have been several threads on giving and receiving crit recently. You'd do well to read them because you have a good understanding of the skills needed to take good photos and pp them well, but zero people skills and masking them as "stark truth" does not make it okay.
I have read the threads you mention and while I agree with some of it I also find some of it wish washy. As for people skills, I possess more than you'll ever know but I'll not go into that here because it's nobody's business. You may interpret my comments as rude but I don't. If I decided to be rude, you'd certainly know. As for insulting George, no offence was meant and having seen his work I am aware of his level of expertise.
Yeh, I do have an understanding of what it takes to produce a good bird photograph and I also have an appreciation of how "Ooh great pic" type comments have a negative impact on the quality of pictures because folk then accept sub standard pictures as being ok or better when they clearly are not. This has been a historical problem in this section and it appears to be coming more prevalent again. Hence, you'll note a lot of regular posters, including myself, have lost interest in posting images on here with such frequency. Which is a great shame because there were some really good bird photographers in this sub forum.
I will continue to voice my opinion as I see things within the Forum rules and I'm sure if I breach these the Mods will quickly let me know. As far as I'm concerned in regards to this Thread, my comments, while direct, robust and honest in my opinion where simply that and not rude nor were they intended to be. You may opine differently, that's your right but differing views does not necessarily make either of us right.
Behind the bike sheds in 10 minutes!!That's fair enough. I'm not here for an argument - that's the other room.
I'm not here for that either!Behind the bike sheds in 10 minutes!!
BRASH
A training course i attended taught me to smile when i answer the phone,perhaps you could try smiling when you type
Most people know that Brash and I get on well, saying that, even I sometimes cringe a bit when I read his posts. This post is absolutely spot on, praising poor shots rather than saying why they are poor has had a very negative impact on the quality of shots in this forum. Whilst they are still some superb bird photographers on here, the forum has lost many and many others do not post as often as they once used to.I have read the threads you mention and while I agree with some of it I also find some of it wish washy. As for people skills, I possess more than you'll ever know but I'll not go into that here because it's nobody's business. You may interpret my comments as rude but I don't. If I decided to be rude, you'd certainly know. As for insulting George, no offence was meant and having seen his work I am aware of his level of expertise.
Yeh, I do have an understanding of what it takes to produce a good bird photograph and I also have an appreciation of how "Ooh great pic" type comments have a negative impact on the quality of pictures because folk then accept sub standard pictures as being ok or better when they clearly are not. This has been a historical problem in this section and it appears to be coming more prevalent again. Hence, you'll note a lot of regular posters, including myself, have lost interest in posting images on here with such frequency. Which is a great shame because there were some really good bird photographers in this sub forum.
I will continue to voice my opinion as I see things within the Forum rules and I'm sure if I breach these the Mods will quickly let me know. As far as I'm concerned in regards to this Thread, my comments, while direct, robust and honest in my opinion where simply that and not rude nor were they intended to be. You may opine differently, that's your right but differing views does not necessarily make either of us right.
Just calm down folks...lifes too shortYeh, I can see that from your avatar.
I always smile while I type, in fact I smile almost all of the time then occasionally laugh too.
Brash has his own style - it takes some getting used to - it took me sometime to do that - he says what some thinks in a very harsh way - most would just pass the image by and say nothing, but he does know his Birds and what he is talking about, but diplomacy is not high on his list of priorities.
If there was some system of numerically "scoring" an image in various areas without being personal, maybe it would help, but saying something is good when it is not does not help anyone ………. many now just keep quite unless they know the "poster" ………. Brash is not a fan of Robin unless he takes the image ……….. so I will be posting a few at the first available opportunity.
I'm now used to Brash …… so I don't get upset or annoyed ………. he is just part of the "rich tapestry of life" that makes this Bird section the more interesting ……. don't worry about it his is just a (leave you to chose your own word).
He certainly should have more respect for his elders, i.e. me and gramps etc., …… life an't what it was like when I was a lad
Feel need to try and clarify here guys thought when you made a critic it was made on the particular photo not on the some other critic if you get my drift.
Certainly the original photographer would be able to compare the various feedback made by other photographers.
Once we get past the judge and jury system on this section things may improve.
Not wanting to protract this any further,will bow out now.
GEORGE.
The way you see it is the way I intended No worries earlier this evening I sold this image to a Christmas magazine........
REST MY CASE AMEN
Yeh, I can see that from your avatar.
I always smile while I type, in fact I smile almost all of the time then occasionally laugh too.
One thing i have never understood is why people post pictures in a critique section and then dont allow editing,not that ime suggesting members like BRASH should pp every critiqued image but ime sure on occasion it would help.