excalibur2
My F4's Broken...
- Messages
- 11,795
- Name
- Brian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I defy anyone with a digital camera to beat these.
Andy
Well it would have to be a medium format digital camera
I defy anyone with a digital camera to beat these.
Andy
Excellent shots.....interesting to know if it would look even better with slower colour film.
Wow. I admit I didn't understand a word of your explanation (sorry, still a newbie) but whatever it meant it worked a treat. That first shot is stunning and the crop, well I'm lost for words at how sharp and clear it is. I defy anyone with a digital camera to beat these.
Andy
Very nice Alan, so if I'm interpreting correctly the new Portra has quite a wide latitude for long exposures at night, and probbaly no significant reciprocity failure at least as far as one or two minutes.
Well it would have to be a medium format digital camera
Like it Rob. I'm after getting a 40mm Nokton for my R3a so I'd be interested in seeing a few more samples if possible. Have to say looking good so far.
Andy
Its a really nice, light & compact lens - very nice for out and about, and good value, think I paid around... £350 with hood etc. Its a little short in focal length for my usual kind of shooting, but I think it may grow on me very quickly I'll post more as and when.
Gulp!
The Hexanon pancake 40mm f1.8 is an excellent lens for about £20
Sounds to good to be true I'm all digital I dont know about all these bargains
Well I have two and bought them before the word got out for about £8 each, but would agree Hexanon can't compete with the Nokton wide open but stopped down a bit I'm sure it would come close.
Interesting results:-
http://www.northcoastphotos.com/Lympa_2007_09_29.htm
Interesting images there Brian. The Hexanon certainly holds its own against the Zuiko and isn't a million miles from the Leica at 2.8.
Andy
How are people converting their photos to digital? Because i just found some old holiday snaps (well, about four years ago...) taken with a disposable film camera, some of the shots are pretty decent on the print outs but when i scan them the quality drops... considerably. It's supposed to be a pretty decent scanner too, all in one (C7180). I'd try the negs but i can't for the life of me remember where i put them. Cheers
Superb photo!
Here, Here!That it is, but did you really have to quote it? We don't all have 1MB/s broadband you know
Here, Here!
how did the MOT go, Mark...?
I attended Glasgow's Southern General this morning --- lotsa needles stuck into muscles to test neurological response
not pleasant but got a clean bill of health =
took the A1 with B&W film - too much rain though....:thumbsdown:
That it is, but did you really have to quote it? We don't all have 1MB/s broadband you know
Superb photo!
****Superb photo****
Indeed, but what makes it into a winner is:- it looks clear and sharp and has all the tones from white to black.
afternoon walk with Nikon EM
still learning about B&W exposures..........
Looking good to me, and using the Nikon 50mm lens?
afternoon walk with Nikon EM
still learning about B&W exposures..........
bit of a 'light-leak' on top left...?
new seals ordered
That it is, but did you really have to quote it? We don't all have 1MB/s broadband you know
Well I have a soft spot for my EM, all I did was compose and press the shutter button and it gave me a very good snap.
I think most HTTP clients only download the same image once on a page. It gets cached.
I think most HTTP clients only download the same image once on a page. It gets cached.
Love it, where is it?
When images are linked to Flickr, most of the burden and load is on their servers, no?