MattEg
TPer Emeritus
- Messages
- 2,934
- Name
- Matthew Egan
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm following this dispute with interest.
For years I've thought Sky over bid for program rights, because they
know they can charge what they want to recoup the funds they've outlaid.
For this reason I have not and will never subscribe to their services.
Now Virgin Media are standing their ground and refusing to cough up the
excessive charges Sky are asking for, (hopefully they don't cave in).
This is all down to sky asking for twice the amount of money for their content.
They have already offered a reduced price which would save Virgin £2m,
but they will still need to find an extra £17m (approx) to pay for the content.
Hopefully the outcome from this will be that all TV becomes cheaper and
some of the content finds its way to the other channels, that we don't need to pay for.
For years I've thought Sky over bid for program rights, because they
know they can charge what they want to recoup the funds they've outlaid.
For this reason I have not and will never subscribe to their services.
Now Virgin Media are standing their ground and refusing to cough up the
excessive charges Sky are asking for, (hopefully they don't cave in).
This is all down to sky asking for twice the amount of money for their content.
They have already offered a reduced price which would save Virgin £2m,
but they will still need to find an extra £17m (approx) to pay for the content.
Hopefully the outcome from this will be that all TV becomes cheaper and
some of the content finds its way to the other channels, that we don't need to pay for.