I see you are taken with Burtynsky to the point you are trying to ape him in subject matter and even couched your language in his political agenda. The promotion of these images, agendas and their acceptance by the establishment have obviously influenced you. I mean your images aren't the same standard as his obviously, but cool captures nonetheless.
Nice try... but you're using the wrong tactics if you wish to annoy me. Your opinion of my work is worthless. You've already demonstrated your total inability to judge the worth of any work quite satisfactorily. I do not take you seriously.
You're like a performing seal. It approximates intelligent behaviour, and that's why we find it amusing. You're kind of like that
However, you can always have too much of a good thing.
I realise that having a worthy opinion relies on intellect, knowledge and study rather than actually being a photographer (Barthes, Sontag, Clarke et al), but YOU would clearly disagree with that as these are all intellectuals who are not photographers, and that would fly right into the teeth of your argument, so... your knowledge, opinions etc, must be because your such an experienced, talented and well respected photographer, right?
Post away... show us the way. We'd love to see the work of someone who single handedly dismisses the whole art world as charlatans. It must be seminal, ground-breaking stuff. I can't wait.
Oh... sorry... I've asked that of you before. You never do, do you?
[edit]
Out of curiosity... I've just looked at your post history. The word "troll" comes to mind. It's always a good idea to not feed trolls, so I'll be ignoring you in this thread from now on... unless that is, you start making some points that are worth reading, and are more than just posting a link to Burtinsky, followed by "if this was Lik you'd hate it because you are a [insert derogatory comment about artists here]"
