Interested to read this thread as I'm upgrading and slithering between the two (struck me that the £400 difference might be better put towards quality glass).
Sorry to be really thick, but what are the posts referring to by "MA"?
Thanks,
Alistair
Demilion says I'm proved wrong. I hadn't intended to post again but really, while the actions of Getty in the case you referred to appear awful there are many many differences in fact and circumstances from the present issue.
Anyway, as I said it is everyone's right to ignore any advice I've...
I wish the original poster well. Unplugged chooses to throw insults at me and give out advice apparently based on some kind of hunch. I do not wish to engage further in personal exchanges of that type.
I have at various points in this thread given advice which is legally accurate, and I would...
AWP and Splog, I am greatly impressed by your enthusiasm and your energy, but trust me on this - you have no legal right to charge double the going rate.
You can chance your arm and try it and if you get paid it, great. If you go to court though looking for double it's value and saying that's...
Interesting to see some of the recent comments. You have no right to charge double rates for unauthorised use or to impose any "penalty". Of course if the company are willing to pay that then good luck to you. The only downside of this is that if you went to a small claims court and were...
That's the problem with charities isn't it - always wanting stuff for nothing! (tongue firmly in cheek).
Seriously though, I am beginning to feel a bit sorry for Somelier who may not have appreciated when posting that the organisation isn't something like a local authority. I think the...
You have actually made good progress here. As a matter of law I can tell you that there is no defence to say you used someone's copyright material by accident. The publication didn't populate itself. If it was your intellectual property and if they chose to use it without permission or payment...
No problem in Scotland - in fact it would certainly be the appropriate forum. This may be different down south, but I'd be fairly surprised (unless you are talking about interdict/injunction). Again, if you get that far you can check with the local court staff.
As it happens I am a lawyer (in Scotland, so the courts are different, but the law on this is the same).
My advice, for what it may be worth is -
1. Absolutely ensure it is your image and that you can in due course prove it is your image. Eg you have the original file with full exif info...
Absolutely lovely series of shots - helped by a very photogenic model! I recently got a nifty fifty too and I can't believe how much enjoyment I've had with it for the price. Lucky you persevered - it was worth it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.