Recent content by anglefire

Thanks Darren, I'm still exploring the possibilities - but it is looking really good. I'll have to read the manual about some of this too I think!

Yes, but I had the stroke turned on too, so it ends up looking strange! Or it did with the settings I had!

I'll not do it now - it's time I was in bed :lol: But I'll run the scripts and post what I mean - it will be easier than words!

I've just found this and have downloaded it :thumbs: Looks really good - though I have a few questions! (I've only skimmed the manual :naughty:) Firstly, I'm using Vista (I did read the manual re-security first :thumbs:) and CS5 64bit. 1. Using a modified EXIF script, I wanted to have full...

Good review, very much what I see with my 70-200.

Thanks for the comments - one thing I didn't mention was the price - and its not cheap! But for some (me included!) its worth the money. And the colour and contrast is consistant with my other L's which is a benifit I think!

Having just bought one of these, I thought I would share some experiences of the lens in the real world. By that I mean that I won't be reviewing pictures of boxes or anything. First thing to say is that the lens, as expected is very well built; I tried a 28-135IS - and that is flimsy by...

I have the 70-200 F/4 l, the 17-40 f/4 L and just got in the last couple of weeks the 24-105 f/4 IS. I would say the 24-105 is on a par with the 70-200 for sharpness. But it stays sharper with slow shutter speeds - I've hand held at 1.3secs - and it was the subject that moved (I know this...

I bought he 24-105 recently - my first IS lens and its fantastic! And yes the IS is necesary - if you like to take shots of stationary objects in low light. I've managed to get some good shots at stupid shutter speeds. Its also been used by my wife at a school sports day (IS off!) to great...