Recent content by pete 1

used them, had no issues other than saving a few quid

My advice was canon but have any of you worked with either or both ? Asking for someone going on a safari and can't decide :oops: :$

Now i realise the primes are sharper but i often find only if pixel peeping and often the biggest difference is the price, its not i'm disappointed with the sigma . Far from it, just the weight for travelling but again that versatility ...................

Very tempted to pull the trigger on this, have the sigma 150=600 sport which i'm happy with though it is a heavy bulk, but will the IQ be significantly better ?? anyone used both?? (birds and wildlife) Z6ii

Yes i have along with the dp quattro, lovely camera that produces great images , af still slow compared to other mirroless , only just purchased myself . i found this guy rather helpful View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_MZRqw1RG4

Sony RX10 IV , best bridge camera ever produced and the only one with phase detection af though above your budget

Yes I've read that quite a lot ,I don't mind paying extra for quality rather than get something cheap and then not be happy with it , I have the tamron 45 1.8 which is excellent but that's as wide as I've got

Yes was debating that one, tamron 24 70 for the versatility or add the tamron 35 which will probably be wide enough on ff and would have other uses to.

What's a decent wide angle for the 6d mk ii ,it probably wont be the most used lens so don't want to spend a fortune.

I've just bought a olympus stylus 1, just want something small and I know it's an old one now but still full featured with very good iq for the sensor size and cheap.

My rx10 3 is in classifieds if anyone interested

They're still available new so I suspect they're still producing them unless it's just stock that's left.

According to a rep I spoke to earlier in the year they have no plans to update it[emoji10] but I suppose that could change otherwise it remains a sony/Panasonic franchise

It's a pity canon have no intention of updating, if they put their latest af system and incorporated a viewfinder they would certainly have a good option, I had this but the viewfinder and the af was the bug bear for me. But it's still a good camera

I don't shoot any sports but have got bif without any problems as others have shown , of course it's not the best for that but good enough for occasional use , I'm sure the iv will be far superior in that regard but unless that's your main area of photography I see little more it has to offer.