To be fair I think most caring parents wouldn't smoke with a child in the car anyway. This is to protect the children who's parent are either ignorant to the bad effects smoking in a small space has on children or those that just don't care.
The lens will be used along side a 70-200 canon so reach isn't too important.
Stabilization would be extremely useful though.
I think i'm now stuck between the Sigma 17-50/f2.8 OS and the canon 17-55is f2.8
I bought a 3rd party battery for my 60D from 7dayshop over a year ago. I don't even notice anymore which one i'm using as it's as good as the canon original one.
As above really.
These two lenses seem to come out around a similar price point but which is better?
Obviously the sigma is the faster of the 2 lenses, but how much better optically is the canon?
Which focuses faster and more accurately?
Is the extra F# worth the loss in quality?
Yahoo goal update commentary -
64' This should shake things up a bit with Liverpool’s star men off the bench. A problem for Udinese now.
i'm thinking not.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.