Just, exactly, where does it come from?
Lynton said:Just, exactly, where does it come from?
I also notice it's a loan, not a bail-out.
2blue4u said:No it doesn't. It is a loan of up to 100 bn, exact amount pending a number of audits, from two Eurozone funds - which we do not contribute to as we're not members of the Eurozone.
10 to 15 years ago banks were handing out 100+% mortgages to any old Tom, Dick or Jose.
Doesn't it sound a lot like religion?
ZoneV said:I find it the whole thing fascinating.
It seems that no-one understands it yet the bigwigs claim to know what's neccessary to resolve the problem, because if people lose faith, the system will fail.
Doesn't it sound a lot like religion?
samems said:I know it is said that Santander UK is safe but do you worry about it? I know money is protected up to certain levels.
Santander and BBVA are less exposed to the collapse of the property market than other banks here. Also Santander UK is a different company whose practices are governed by the Bank of England. From what I've read, and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, there is no need to worry.
gramps said:No religion is much more stable.
It is fascinating. Part of the problem too, is that those that know and operate the system are part of the tiny percentage that own the vast majority of the wealth. Very self serving.
Just, exactly, where does it come from?
I also notice it's a loan, not a bail-out.
Forbiddenbiker said:yep, It is in fact the same debt, just the last of the ripples, again, from 2008.
Its not the peoples fault in any manner, anyone who thinks that has fallen hook line and sinker for the BS.
Flash In The Pan said:I'd have to disagree there, whilst it's not everyone's fault, some blame must lie at the feet of those who took on 100% mortgages etc without any contingency plans for paying should the worst happen.
No-one forced these unaffordable debts on the borrowers.
hsuffyan said:Yes, but that level of prudence pre-2007 was unheard of and I would argue that the general public is mostly unaware of the risks of taking highly leveraged mortgages. Banks, brokers and estate agents were ramming these down the throats of joe public that you'd have to hold a very shrewd view to not get caught up in it.
Yes, but that level of prudence pre-2007 was unheard of and I would argue that the general public is mostly unaware of the risks of taking highly leveraged mortgages. Banks, brokers and estate agents were ramming these down the throats of joe public that you'd have to hold a very shrewd view to not get caught up in it.
Anyone interested in financial markets should have a regular read of http://www.zerohedge.com and forget about mainstream media!
arclight said:That is an interesting website and, indeed, the mainstream media are not exactly paragons of truth. However, as one who does not know who to believe in all this finance business, what is it that makes the information on that website credible.
This is not a criticism of yourself. I would just like to be able to verify what that website has to say.
Currently the problems in Europe are grabbing the attention, but the ticking timebomb is America's debt
Very good post
I guess credibility can only be determined by the reader and by following their views for a while and comparing against one's own inclinations. I've followed it for over two years and it's helped me quickly assess the situation and I've benefitted from it.
I'd have to disagree there, whilst it's not everyone's fault, some blame must lie at the feet of those who took on 100% mortgages etc without any contingency plans for paying should the worst happen.
No-one forced these unaffordable debts on the borrowers.
Forbiddenbiker said:Brainwashed might be a better word than forced, but yes sure, what with the price of housing, what choice did they have?!
Lynton said:so you mean there's not a convoy of articulated lorries heading to Madrid with €100Bn in them? Damn! That plan is scuppered.
Nobody was "brainwashed", greed took over, pure and simple, both on the part of the buyers and the banks.