- Messages
- 2,390
- Name
- Nick
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all,
I am aware this topic has been covered to death, but I was just talking to a very keen wildlife photographer who has mentioned something that got me thinking.
His opinion was that teleconverters CAN be good.. but only in a situation where there is already detail - allow me to explain.
He said that if you add a 1.4x TC to your lens with the intention that it will bring something that is miles away a little nearer, then you will be disappointed. However, if you add a 1.4x TC to your lens and shoot a subject that is relatively close, and it just allows you to fill the frame better, then it will be very good.
His argument was that a lens can only resolve the detail that is there in the first place. So if you're shooting something 300m away, then obviously the fine accurate detail of that subject will be limited, and sticking a 1.4x or even 2x TC on wont make things any better at all, it will still be the same detail, just with slightly higher magnification - which might not look any better than just a crop would have done.
However, if that subject was just 20m away, then the detail will be much higher at that range, but if it still doesn't quite fill your frame at that range, then in that situation adding a 1.4x TC on will be using the TC for its intended purpose.
This was coming from someone with a Nikon (boo hiss) D700 (12mpx IIRC)
I just wondered how this would relate to a Canon 5DMk2 user, which has 21mpx and therefore a lot more cropping potential.
Thoughts?
I am aware this topic has been covered to death, but I was just talking to a very keen wildlife photographer who has mentioned something that got me thinking.
His opinion was that teleconverters CAN be good.. but only in a situation where there is already detail - allow me to explain.
He said that if you add a 1.4x TC to your lens with the intention that it will bring something that is miles away a little nearer, then you will be disappointed. However, if you add a 1.4x TC to your lens and shoot a subject that is relatively close, and it just allows you to fill the frame better, then it will be very good.
His argument was that a lens can only resolve the detail that is there in the first place. So if you're shooting something 300m away, then obviously the fine accurate detail of that subject will be limited, and sticking a 1.4x or even 2x TC on wont make things any better at all, it will still be the same detail, just with slightly higher magnification - which might not look any better than just a crop would have done.
However, if that subject was just 20m away, then the detail will be much higher at that range, but if it still doesn't quite fill your frame at that range, then in that situation adding a 1.4x TC on will be using the TC for its intended purpose.
This was coming from someone with a Nikon (boo hiss) D700 (12mpx IIRC)
I just wondered how this would relate to a Canon 5DMk2 user, which has 21mpx and therefore a lot more cropping potential.
Thoughts?
Last edited: