Raging! Just had this response from the seller;
"This item was sold with a returns policy of "no returns accepted". This is clearly shown on the listing.
It was described as having "the odd small mark" as well as having "lots of small scratches on the lens hood".
It was never described as being in "mint condition", which seems to be what you were expecting.
The lens has never been dropped to my knowledge, and I have never had a problem attaching it to any of our 3 Canon DSLRs.
There is variance within engineering tolerances, so maybe it is slightly stiff on your camera, or maybe you are just very sensitive?
The scuff mark you mention was the only mark I found on the lens itself, and it is small, about a centimetre long. I didn't see any other marks but I put in the description that the lens had "the odd small mark" incase there was something I had missed.
The lens works flawlessly and optically it is in perfect condition, which you don't seem to dispute.
You seem to think you could have purchased a mint condition lens cheaper, if that is the case, it's your fault, not mine.
I think your demand to send the lens back and have your postage refunded it totally unjustified."
Suppose I should have known better than to buy on ebay. I tried the lens on my 500d too and it is really stiff on that also. In the description the seller described it as "the lens would look like new if it had a new lens hood". Absolute garbage. Ebay dispute it is then
