24-105 L on 60D
- Thread starter brad28
- Start date
- Messages
- 1,224
- Name
- Adrian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I reckon you'll lose about 6mm of the wide angle - and also about 30mm on the telephoto 
How much do you rely on 18-24mm and on 105-135mm?
I'm sure that the 24-105mmL is capable of giving very good results on the 60D but I have never used that combination.
I use a 28-135mm as my 'usual' lens on my 50D. Sometimes it's not wide enough, but I keep a 10-20mm in my bag, which is sometimes a bit too wide. I haven't been frustrated and I don't feel especially handicapped by it.
How much do you rely on 18-24mm and on 105-135mm?
I'm sure that the 24-105mmL is capable of giving very good results on the 60D but I have never used that combination.
I use a 28-135mm as my 'usual' lens on my 50D. Sometimes it's not wide enough, but I keep a 10-20mm in my bag, which is sometimes a bit too wide. I haven't been frustrated and I don't feel especially handicapped by it.
- Messages
- 21,339
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I use the 24-105 on my 50d all the time. About 90% of all my photos are taken with it, but I do have a 10-22 for the ultra wide as well. I find it a brilliant lens, although at times the 24 is a little long on a crop, but upto 105 makes it a very versatile walkabout lens.
- Messages
- 1,224
- Name
- Adrian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Good point. I was only thinking in terms of focal length - I tend not to think about wide apertures on account of the cost
- Messages
- 1,525
- Name
- Neil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Why are you not sure?! Obviously you will.
OP
- Messages
- 749
- Name
- bradley
- Edit My Images
- Yes
weybourne said:I reckon you'll lose about 6mm of the wide angle - and also about 30mm on the telephoto
How much do you rely on 18-24mm and on 105-135mm?.
I've got a 10-22mm canon and find it too wide at times so 24mm would be ok
At times I find the 105-135mm useful.
I'm thinking the lens I have may be good enough as it covers a good focal length