24-70mm for portraits?

Messages
132
Edit My Images
No
Before Christmas I was lusting after the 24-70 and 70-200 zooms but I managed to convince myself to stick with my 30/50/85 primes for now, given the weight difference and financial outlay. However, after a session with my 4 year old in the park with my 85mm I think I need to invest in a zoom.

I'm about to start doing family portrait sessions - outdoors natural light stuff. I'm thinking 24-70mm 2.8 to start with and I'm tempted to go with Nikon rather than Sigma. It's quite an investment though. Any experiences/advice would be very welcome before I take the plunge.

(I've got a D90 at the mo)
 
Last edited:
Go for the Nikon, you wont regret it!

Super sharp, great length, perfect for portraits. Also if you ever upgrade to FX, you'll have an awesome combo.
 
i was out yesterday in the park with my neices and had the 70-200 with me first time i've really used it and was just gobsmacked by it.
 
I've seen amazing shots with the 70-200 but I found I needed to be able to go wider than I could with the 85mm so I'd be concerned that that would be an issue, plus I need to be fairly close in order to interact with the kids and the additional weight is another issue.
 
i have not long had my Nikkor 70-200mm and all i can say is ...WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW! best lens i have ever owned ..(and the most expensive too!!)

my next lens will be the nikkor 24-70 2.8..i have the sigma 24-70 f2.8 and its ok but not a patch on any nikkor .. i get better photos with my Nikkor 12-24 f4 !!
 
Back
Top