Sorry, I didn't make that clear - but I knew that - they are mini APS-C bodies. By larger, I mean they are physically a little bit larger than the u4/3s from Panasonic & Oly, but similar idea. Image quality appears to be slightly better too.Sony don't make any 4/3 cameras, never have!
Sorry, I didn't make that clear - but I knew that - they are mini APS-C bodies. By larger, I mean they are physically a little bit larger than the u4/3s from Panasonic & Oly, but similar idea. Image quality appears to be slightly better too.
I bought a GX1 quite recently BTW...
I've had it a whole week now! I really like it. It, with the standard 14-42, 14mm pancake and 7.5mm Samyang fisheye are smaller and lighter than my 5D2 body and grip (let alone with a lens attached). I have a wrist strap on it and will be taking it to Japan next weekend for 10 days. Hoping to get some good pics of Tokyo and Osaka. Straight out of camera, you have to pixel peep to see the differences between it and the (now sadly sold) 7D. The 5D2 is a little easier to see, but then any of the lenses I regularly use on the 5D2 cost more than the whole GX1 setup.What are your impressions of the GX1 if I may ask Andy?
So the Panasonic ranges are good then? Would you say that it's worth getting one over say a Canon PowerShot G1 X (can't change the lens but the images are good)
Wouldn't this be the resolving power of the lens at the frame edges?I had a look at the Canon GX1 images on DPR and the very edges of the frame seem quite bad.
Ahh... you mean Canon G1X not Panasonic GX1. Given the fact you didn't quote the post you were replying to was 3 days old and the two posts above yours were referencing the Pana GX1, it's a pretty safe assumption that people will miss the Canon bit and think you meant the GX1As you can't change the lens does it really matter what causes it?
Don't get me started on religion.... But your apology was acceptedLord preserve us...![]()