AD_Capturs
Mummy, where do babies come from?
- Messages
- 4,571
- Name
- Anthony
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Ok so I hear that the screen on a 5D classic is not very good but is it as bad or worse then the 1000D screen?
Tony
Tony
stupar said:I thought that the 5D and the 1000D had the same 2.5" inch 230,000 screen so in theory there shouldn't be much difference at all if any.
odd jim said:That's what I thought, same as the 400d too? To be honest I wouldn't worry about the screen. Sure it's nice having a good screen (couldn't believe how good the 50d 's was when I first saw it!) but as long as it's good enough to check the basics which the 5dc's is it doesn't really matter.
I can't comment on the quality comparison to the 1000D screen, but the rear LCD on the later 5DI production models (serial nos 2xx... and 3xx... IIRC) is superior (brighter and warmer) to that found on the early (serial nos 0xx... and 1xx...) models.Ok so I hear that the screen on a 5D classic is not very good but is it as bad or worse then the 1000D screen?
Tony
duttytd said:I dont have any ef-s lenses luckily enough. What is the build quality of the classic like?
trevorbray said:It's a well built, big, strong, heavy lump compared to the 1000D. Feels very good in the hand. You'll love it
It's really sounding like a whole lot of camera for 500/600
coldrobba said:Same screen both 2.5" and same screen dots of 230,000. Remember you will loose live view, but gain a whole lot more in other areas!
coldrobba said:5D it is then, no doubt about it, but buy some nice glass to go with it!