- Messages
- 373
- Name
- Graeme
- Edit My Images
- No
So, denizens of both, what are your thoughts? I figure since I have a 1D Mark IV as my primary bird photography and wildlife camera, i'm debating either getting a 5D Mark III as a secondary camera, which i could put my 800mm on at times where i'm not distance limited to maximise image quality, i know the autofocus is lightyears ahead, FPS and build quality which are the two prime defining features which separate this range, but for those with hands on experience, for a secondary camera, am I better off saving the best part of a grand and getting a 6D? Could use it as my primary landscape camera, too. So for times i do wildlife cgrab the mark IV, and landscape grab the 6 - I have read that the ISO is fractionally better on the 6 as opposed to the 5 and that the files can take more pp, also that there is no colour banding, or am i better off putting more on the outlay, getting a 5D Mark III as my secondary camera as a great all-arounder ? Hmm ...
Just curious on people's thoughts.
This is slowly becoming my favourite part of the TP forums just as i have some questions worth getting off my chest, haha.
Best wishes
Graeme
Just curious on people's thoughts.
Best wishes
Graeme
Last edited: