K
kinchy
Guest
Hello all,
Done a search for this, but its hard considering what i need to search on, so havent found the answer
Basically im after the 70-200mm and have decided on either of 2 flavours.
1. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Lens (non-IS) for £630 (OSD)
or
2. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for £629 (OSD)
So seeing as they are the same price, which would be more beneficial.
I would use it for handheld stuff aswell as indoor shots, so both the f/2.8 and the IS would be useful, but can i get away with not having IS for the sake of having f/2.8?
Im not forking out an extra £370 for both IS and f/2.8.
I would love to hear your opinions.
Done a search for this, but its hard considering what i need to search on, so havent found the answer
Basically im after the 70-200mm and have decided on either of 2 flavours.
1. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Lens (non-IS) for £630 (OSD)
or
2. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for £629 (OSD)
So seeing as they are the same price, which would be more beneficial.
I would use it for handheld stuff aswell as indoor shots, so both the f/2.8 and the IS would be useful, but can i get away with not having IS for the sake of having f/2.8?
Im not forking out an extra £370 for both IS and f/2.8.
I would love to hear your opinions.