- Messages
- 220
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- No
I was recently lucky enough to pick up a Canon 70-200IS L lens. Before using this i was using the Canon 70-300 IS USM lens which obviously has a bit more zoom at the sacrafice of image quality and F stop. Now, i still have the use of this lens as i gave it to my wife to use but i was toying with the idea of either a 1.4 or 2x extender for the 70-200 but don't know much about them. I had thought about getting a 100-400L as well but for the amount of times i need a zoom that length it's probably a bit over kill and i can't really justify the expense.
So, how will the 70-200 with a 1.4 or 2x extender compare with the 70-300 in terms of image quality and F number i can use? How much better would a Canon 100-400 zoom be than using the 70-200 with a 2X extender?
It does seem a reasonably cheap way of getting extra reach out of my existing 70-200 ens but i don't want to spend the money if i'll be no better off than using my wifes 70-300 (which also benefits from being easier to lug around!!)
Hope that makes sense? I know what i mean in my head but sometimes have difficulty translating it to something meaningful to others!! lol
So, how will the 70-200 with a 1.4 or 2x extender compare with the 70-300 in terms of image quality and F number i can use? How much better would a Canon 100-400 zoom be than using the 70-200 with a 2X extender?
It does seem a reasonably cheap way of getting extra reach out of my existing 70-200 ens but i don't want to spend the money if i'll be no better off than using my wifes 70-300 (which also benefits from being easier to lug around!!)
Hope that makes sense? I know what i mean in my head but sometimes have difficulty translating it to something meaningful to others!! lol