Shine On Messages 928 Name Paul Edit My Images No 25 Apr 2013 #3 That model suffered with a lot of noise.
Dave * Messages 7,508 Name Dave Edit My Images Yes 25 Apr 2013 #4 realspeed said: Not what you thought Realspeed Click to expand... I found this did you lose one somewhere
realspeed said: Not what you thought Realspeed Click to expand... I found this did you lose one somewhere
Scarecrow Messages 1,662 Name Derek Edit My Images Yes 25 Apr 2013 #6 The reason that's not what I thought it might be is because that's a really old cannon, not a really old Canon.
The reason that's not what I thought it might be is because that's a really old cannon, not a really old Canon.
Barrysprout Messages 6,791 Name Colin Edit My Images No 25 Apr 2013 #7 Never mind all that, what on earth is the person trying to do with the cannon furthest away?
ZoneV Messages 3,163 Edit My Images Yes 25 Apr 2013 #8 Barrysprout said: Never mind all that, what on earth is the person trying to do with the cannon furthest away? Click to expand... Reverb.
Barrysprout said: Never mind all that, what on earth is the person trying to do with the cannon furthest away? Click to expand... Reverb.
N Nighthawke Messages 43 Name Ian Edit My Images No 25 Apr 2013 #9 No good for birds either - look how close that sparrow is!
OldCarlos Messages 6,882 Name Carl Edit My Images Yes 25 Apr 2013 #10 Probably nearly as accurate as the modern digital Canon's
Dave * Messages 7,508 Name Dave Edit My Images Yes 25 Apr 2013 #11 OldCarlos said: Probably nearly as accurate as the modern digital Canon's Click to expand... I suppose it's difficult for you Mitsubishi users to recognise quality :razz: I mean, the same company was responsible for the Proton Saga
OldCarlos said: Probably nearly as accurate as the modern digital Canon's Click to expand... I suppose it's difficult for you Mitsubishi users to recognise quality :razz: I mean, the same company was responsible for the Proton Saga