- Messages
- 957
- Name
- Ben
- Edit My Images
- No
I’ve come across it before but this evening I was reading a book by ansel Adams in which he talks about a few of his photos and the equipment and the development he used to make them, i forget the name of book. In one of the photos he said he did the same, shortening the developing time to make an easy to print negative.
I was thinking about trying it but as I only use roll film I would have to develop all photos on the roll this way. Is there a downside to cutting the development? I thought surely if it makes easy to print negatives why wouldn’t all negatives be developed in less time.
I was thinking about trying it but as I only use roll film I would have to develop all photos on the roll this way. Is there a downside to cutting the development? I thought surely if it makes easy to print negatives why wouldn’t all negatives be developed in less time.