- Messages
- 1,170
- Name
- Jacques
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi guys..
I am currently in a bit of a struggle. I have upgraded from a used 350D to a used 500D a month or so ago and I dont find the image quality up to my liking. I struggle to get perfect focus and almost 99% of the time need to consult photoshop for enhancing the photos..
I always allow for focal length when choosing exposure so it's not a matter of blur, I just don't find the photos as pin sharp as I would like. Can it be something with the body? I have read reviews and most give the 500D an average image quality of 62%. Am I right in thinking that is bad?
To give you guys an idea..
Here's a picture of my son, it was shot with a 50mm f/1.8 II lens. Peoplw say that if you get bad photos with this lens then you must be pretty #&%$ at photography..
It was taken at ISO 200 with an exposure of 1/60 and the only focus point was dead center on his left eye..
It just looks overall blurred and noisy
http://abload.de/img/img_4099t6jse.jpg
I am currently in a bit of a struggle. I have upgraded from a used 350D to a used 500D a month or so ago and I dont find the image quality up to my liking. I struggle to get perfect focus and almost 99% of the time need to consult photoshop for enhancing the photos..
I always allow for focal length when choosing exposure so it's not a matter of blur, I just don't find the photos as pin sharp as I would like. Can it be something with the body? I have read reviews and most give the 500D an average image quality of 62%. Am I right in thinking that is bad?
To give you guys an idea..
Here's a picture of my son, it was shot with a 50mm f/1.8 II lens. Peoplw say that if you get bad photos with this lens then you must be pretty #&%$ at photography..
It was taken at ISO 200 with an exposure of 1/60 and the only focus point was dead center on his left eye..
It just looks overall blurred and noisy
http://abload.de/img/img_4099t6jse.jpg