- Messages
- 1,318
- Name
- Matt
- Edit My Images
- Yes
guys im so indecisive!
i want a longer lens for wildlife.
my best is a 80-200 AF-d ( which has to stay) and its not worth me putting a small 1.4x converter on because it will only give me a tiny bit of extra reach
ive been looking at the
sigma 50-500 for what seems like years!
sigma 120-400
sigma 150-500
but if im honest i havent seen them pruduce any photos that wow me.
now! ive stumbled across the sigma 100-300 f4!! and this seems a superb lens, but! not long enough for wildlife!
ok i could put a 1.4x converter on it? and risk reduced picture quality and speed
but then i think i might as well just buy a 120-400/150-500 ( with what im assuming will be the same quality as the 100-300 with converter) seeing as its a cheaper set-up- as its the longer length that im really after.
im really not keen on a long Prime lens as this will be too restrictive and i get stressed about which lens i need to take out with me as it is!
im using a d300 and budget is around £700! i dont mind buying 2nd hand
i want a longer lens for wildlife.
my best is a 80-200 AF-d ( which has to stay) and its not worth me putting a small 1.4x converter on because it will only give me a tiny bit of extra reach
ive been looking at the
sigma 50-500 for what seems like years!
sigma 120-400
sigma 150-500
but if im honest i havent seen them pruduce any photos that wow me.
now! ive stumbled across the sigma 100-300 f4!! and this seems a superb lens, but! not long enough for wildlife!
ok i could put a 1.4x converter on it? and risk reduced picture quality and speed
but then i think i might as well just buy a 120-400/150-500 ( with what im assuming will be the same quality as the 100-300 with converter) seeing as its a cheaper set-up- as its the longer length that im really after.
im really not keen on a long Prime lens as this will be too restrictive and i get stressed about which lens i need to take out with me as it is!
im using a d300 and budget is around £700! i dont mind buying 2nd hand
