Gary Coyle
In Memoriam
- Messages
- 12,654
- Name
- Gary
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Reviews look positive and is apparently sharper than the Nikon 12-24mm and 16-35mm f/4 with much less distortion.
Anyone tried the Tokina AF 16-28mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO FX Lens for Nikon
- Thread starter Gary Coyle
- Start date
OP
Gary Coyle
In Memoriam
- Messages
- 12,654
- Name
- Gary
- Edit My Images
- Yes
didnt someone cut the end out of a Nikon 14-24mm cap and wangle up some device so filters could be popped into the end cap, sure i saw this somewhere
LongLensPhotography
Th..th..that's all folks!
- Messages
- 18,838
- Name
- LongLensPhotography
- Edit My Images
- No
There are some dodgy ways to mount Lee holder. There is one guy on ebay selling modified Cokin holders.
16-28 looked OK when I tried it, it's a decent lens, but no Zeiss
If you look on the digital picture ISO crops the Nikon looks consistenly sharper and it's 14mm.
{And what makes me think I will buy that Nikon for my Canon before too long?}
16-28 looked OK when I tried it, it's a decent lens, but no Zeiss
If you look on the digital picture ISO crops the Nikon looks consistenly sharper and it's 14mm.{And what makes me think I will buy that Nikon for my Canon before too long?}
OP
Gary Coyle
In Memoriam
- Messages
- 12,654
- Name
- Gary
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Comparing them at 16mm the 14-24mm is better at f/2.8 mid frame and in the corners and slightly better at f/4, but the Tokina is better at f/5.6 and blows the Nikon away in the corners at f/8 and beyond which is where i would be using it and the lack of distortion is a bonus.16-28 looked OK when I tried it, it's a decent lens, but no Zeiss
Now if only the Sigma 12-24mm was as sharp.