Aperture sweet spot

cowasaki

cowasaki

TPer Emeritus
Messages
19,708
Name
Darren
Edit My Images
Yes
I understand about aperture but clearly the best shots do not come from the extremes of aperture on each lens but somewhere in the middle. Is the "sweet spot" found only by experimentation of does this tend to be at a particular place in the range?

So just using my 3 current lenses

AF 50mm f/1.8
AFS 105 f/2.8 vr
AFS 18-200 vr

what are the sweet spots with these and have would say the f1.4 compare with the f1.8 for it's sweet spot.

Does the sweet spot depend on other factors such as distance from object etc.
 
By sweet spot, I guess you mean in terms of sharpness?

This is usually controlled by the f/number. A lens is least sharp at lowest f/number, and at the edges and corners. Central sharpness is always pretty high. As you raise the f/number, aberrations are reduced and sharpness increases, most notably at the edges. It gets higher until the effects of diffraction are greater than the increases of higher f/number, usually somewhere in the middle of the range.

The next biggest factor is focal length on a zoom. There are not any generalisations here, although I think it might be true to say that, mostly, wide zooms are better at the long end, and tele zooms are better at the short end. But I'm sure there are many exceptions to that.

Another factor is focusing distance, and all lenses except macros are optimised for relatively distant subjects. It doesn't make much difference when you get a bit closer, but when it comes to really close up, things will start to change - the image gets softer, the focus plane start to curve and distortion can get worse.

Just guessing with your three lenses, sweet spot with the 50 1.8 will be f/5.6, 105 2.8 VR will be f/5.6, and on the 18-200 VR maybe a bit higher at f/8-11. 50 1.4 will be similar to the 1.8. Another generalisation is perhaps that higher quality lenses peak closer to their lowest f/number than lower quality, or more ambitious lenses.

Edit: take a look here at the graphic for sharpness on the Nikon 18-200. http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_18-200_3p5-5p6_vr_afs_n15/page3.asp Move the sliders on the bottom for Focal Length and Aperture and see the colours change. Red is below average, yellow is okay, green is good and blue is excellent.
 
It will vary from lens to lens but the rule of thumb is 2 stops down is normally pretty good.
 
Because 2 stops down from f/1.8 is a lot better than 2 down from f/4 :lol:
 
pxl8 said:
Because 2 stops down from f/1.8 is a lot better than 2 down from f/4 :lol:
Click to expand...

<---assumes the role of newbie


Yes, but, I want it to be sharp at f/1.8
dummyspit.gif
 
Then you need the 50mm f/1.2L stopped down the f/1.8 - yes, that's right you need to spend lots more money :D
 
Oh no, now he's going to ask about crop factors, field of view, DOF and circles of confusion :exit:
 
this thread is men doing numbers and teknikul stuff innit? :suspect:



I was always told that for most lenses, the 'sweet spot' is always between F8 and F11, but the higher the quality of the lens, the smaller the quality fall off will be outside these apertures. Not sure how accurate this is though :shrug:
 
Yv said:
I was always told that for most lenses, the 'sweet spot' is always between F8 and F11, but the higher the quality of the lens, the smaller the quality fall off will be outside these apertures. Not sure how accurate this is though :shrug:
Click to expand...

That's what I gathered from reading Understanding Exposure, but I could be wrong.
 
classcams, no need for that sort of comment, you may not like the terms but perhaps you need to go and look them up, as you clearly dont know what they actually mean.
 
matty said:
classcams, no need for that sort of comment, you may not like the terms but perhaps you need to go and look them up, as you clearly dont know what they actually mean.
Click to expand...
Oh, but I do know :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top