- Messages
- 18,340
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm still processing some photos I took last August. Here's one I just uploaded:
Replicant by Ricardodaforce, on Flickr
Replicant by Ricardodaforce, on Flickr
This comment might cause debate but...
I saw an article / letter in this months Practical Photography which begged the question along the lines of "Does an image need to be perfectly sharp in all the right areas to be considered a beautiful or good photograph?". The editor agrees with my view that it should not.
This is not a dig at Keiths comment, just reminded me of the article. I personally find this photo very good and love the reflections.
Very good. Buildings seem slightly soft but that may be due to resizing issues.
This is really nice.... like the lines and reflections....
This comment might cause debate but...
I saw an article / letter in this months Practical Photography which begged the question along the lines of "Does an image need to be perfectly sharp in all the right areas to be considered a beautiful or good photograph?". The editor agrees with my view that it should not.
This is not a dig at Keiths comment, just reminded me of the article. I personally find this photo very good and love the reflections.
Fair comment. I think because in this image the bridges angles direct/point your view to the buildings though, it kind of means they should in this case. Open to debate I suppose.
Love the bridge leading you in to the shot.
Ricardo this is absolutely suberb. I wouldn't change a single thing about it.
Nice leading lines, and overall a pleasing image, good work
A different angle.
QUOTE]
Superb, what camera and lens did you used?
Beautiful, Ricardo!
lovely symmetry, very serene images that highlight the structure
x
Love these, nice lines
A different angle.
QUOTE]
Superb, what camera and lens did you used?
Thanks everyone.
Nikon D7000
Sigma 10-20mm
JackBell said:Hi Ricardo,nice shots and i have a feeling these would also look good in B & W.
Jack