Arquitectura Moderna

Very good. Buildings seem slightly soft but that may be due to resizing issues.
(y)
 
This comment might cause debate but...
I saw an article / letter in this months Practical Photography which begged the question along the lines of "Does an image need to be perfectly sharp in all the right areas to be considered a beautiful or good photograph?". The editor agrees with my view that it should not.

This is not a dig at Keiths comment, just reminded me of the article. I personally find this photo very good and love the reflections.
 
ArronTucker said:
This comment might cause debate but...
I saw an article / letter in this months Practical Photography which begged the question along the lines of "Does an image need to be perfectly sharp in all the right areas to be considered a beautiful or good photograph?". The editor agrees with my view that it should not.

This is not a dig at Keiths comment, just reminded me of the article. I personally find this photo very good and love the reflections.
Click to expand...

Fair comment. I think because in this image the bridges angles direct/point your view to the buildings though, it kind of means they should in this case. Open to debate I suppose.
 
DorsetDude said:
Very good. Buildings seem slightly soft but that may be due to resizing issues.
(y)
Click to expand...

Solo man said:
This is really nice.... like the lines and reflections....
Click to expand...

ArronTucker said:
This comment might cause debate but...
I saw an article / letter in this months Practical Photography which begged the question along the lines of "Does an image need to be perfectly sharp in all the right areas to be considered a beautiful or good photograph?". The editor agrees with my view that it should not.

This is not a dig at Keiths comment, just reminded me of the article. I personally find this photo very good and love the reflections.
Click to expand...

DorsetDude said:
Fair comment. I think because in this image the bridges angles direct/point your view to the buildings though, it kind of means they should in this case. Open to debate I suppose.
Click to expand...

Speedy136 said:
Love the bridge leading you in to the shot.
Click to expand...


Thanks guys. I admit, originally I didn't think of this as a keeper for the reasons mentioned. However, I subsequently thought that expecting 100% sharpness can't be achieved 100% of the time for whatever reason; the the image still does what I wanted it to do.
Thanks again (y)
 
Ricardo this is absolutely suberb. I wouldn't change a single thing about it.
 
Beautiful, Ricardo!

lovely symmetry, very serene images that highlight the structure :)

x
 
Hi Ricardo,nice shots and i have a feeling these would also look good in B & W.

Jack
 
JackBell said:
Hi Ricardo,nice shots and i have a feeling these would also look good in B & W.

Jack
Click to expand...

Hi there. There are some mono shots in the Flickr set.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top