Yup, sorry about that ... have you looked at the alternatives "heliopan" ?
http://www.teamworkphoto.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=79_237
Went for the B+W 77mm ND-110. Filter factor of 1000x!
Just a quicky involving maths!
A "1000x" filter reduces the incoming light to 1/1000th of it's original power.
Exposure values work in "stops" of light, which as you may know are exponential. Double the light = +1 to the EV.
Therefore we can use logarithms to work backwards. We want to do log_2, but most calculators have either a log_e or a log_10 button. To do log_2(x), we can do log(x)/log(2)
log(8)/log(2) = 3, so NDx8 takes 3 stops of light.
log(1000)/log(2) = 10, so NDx1000 takes away 10 stops of light.
Not meaning to teach anyone to suck eggs, but I've spoken to quite a few people recently who thought that NDx8 blocked 8 stops of light, or just worked out the relationship by testing it with their meter. It also helps if your in camera meter isn't accurate with the ND filter on. Just take the reading with it off, then apply the filter and set the exposure manually.
Ps. Have you got a remote shutter, as you'll need one for the lenght of exposures you'll be getting with that 10 stop ND.
Just take the reading with it off, then apply the filter and set the exposure manually.
Just a quicky involving maths!
A "1000x" filter reduces the incoming light to 1/1000th of it's original power.
Exposure values work in "stops" of light, which as you may know are exponential. Double the light = +1 to the EV.
Therefore we can use logarithms to work backwards. We want to do log_2, but most calculators have either a log_e or a log_10 button. To do log_2(x), we can do log(x)/log(2)
log(8)/log(2) = 3, so NDx8 takes 3 stops of light.
log(1000)/log(2) = 10, so NDx1000 takes away 10 stops of light.
Not meaning to teach anyone to suck eggs, but I've spoken to quite a few people recently who thought that NDx8 blocked 8 stops of light, or just worked out the relationship by testing it with their meter. It also helps if your in camera meter isn't accurate with the ND filter on. Just take the reading with it off, then apply the filter and set the exposure manually.
......
Just take the reading with it off, then apply the filter and set the exposure manually.
Why would you do this? Would this not yield a darkened photo? Where-as most would use an ND to get "creamy-water" effect?!?
Grrr. Just had an email from warehouse saying the filter is actually out of stock. Hopefully won't have to wait too long.