- Messages
- 6
- Name
- sm21071982@gmail.com
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm looking to take the plunge into semi-serious photography, I'm an aspiring graphic designer so think it's something I should be adding to my skill set.
As my title states I'm working with a budget of around a grand though I could stretch to a little more if necessary.
I'd be using the camera mostly for studio work so mainly product shots involving foods, drinks, jewellery and other small(ish) items.
From researching variuos threads and articles it seems that the lens is as important as the camera so I am thinking of splitting the budget 50/50.
The obvious choice in terms of value seems to be the 550D which I can get, body only, for about £500. I know that the D5100 is around the corner but from what I've learned it's not going to offer significantly better spec and will in all likelyhood be a couple of hundred quid more expensive. Again my budget is flexible so if there's a really compelling reason to extend to the 600-750 pound region, I'd consider it.
The real headache is the choice of lens. For somebody who is firmly at the novice end of the scale the sheer variety of lenses is quite daunting. An employee of Jessops recommended the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 Macro USM and its big brother the Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro USM at £400 and £650 respectively.
As I will only have 1 lens for the medium term am I better to go for a zoom lens which will offer a bit more flexibility, though, from what I've read, compromise macro performance or stick with Jessops man's advice?
Sorry about the long post, hopefully some of you can guide me in the right direction on how best to spend my £1000 and avoid the dreaded buyer's remorse.
Thanks in advance.
As my title states I'm working with a budget of around a grand though I could stretch to a little more if necessary.
I'd be using the camera mostly for studio work so mainly product shots involving foods, drinks, jewellery and other small(ish) items.
From researching variuos threads and articles it seems that the lens is as important as the camera so I am thinking of splitting the budget 50/50.
The obvious choice in terms of value seems to be the 550D which I can get, body only, for about £500. I know that the D5100 is around the corner but from what I've learned it's not going to offer significantly better spec and will in all likelyhood be a couple of hundred quid more expensive. Again my budget is flexible so if there's a really compelling reason to extend to the 600-750 pound region, I'd consider it.
The real headache is the choice of lens. For somebody who is firmly at the novice end of the scale the sheer variety of lenses is quite daunting. An employee of Jessops recommended the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 Macro USM and its big brother the Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro USM at £400 and £650 respectively.
As I will only have 1 lens for the medium term am I better to go for a zoom lens which will offer a bit more flexibility, though, from what I've read, compromise macro performance or stick with Jessops man's advice?
Sorry about the long post, hopefully some of you can guide me in the right direction on how best to spend my £1000 and avoid the dreaded buyer's remorse.
Thanks in advance.