First of all I don't want to get into a nikon vrs Canon debate but here is my story/question.
A guy in work has a nikon d90 but he doesn't know too much about it to be honest at he has only ever used auto all the time. He wants to have a go at macro photography and is convinced that Canon are the better than nikon at macro lenses.
He is obsessed that the lens has to have a 1.5 magnification. I have been looking around on the macro section and I do notice that a lot of the shots are from Canon gear, he is particularly interested in the extreme closeups of fly/bugs eyes, etc.
So what is everyones honest opinion, as a general rule with regards to macro are Canons macro lenses better than nikon macro lenses or is it pretty much the same?
Thanks
Clarke.
A guy in work has a nikon d90 but he doesn't know too much about it to be honest at he has only ever used auto all the time. He wants to have a go at macro photography and is convinced that Canon are the better than nikon at macro lenses.
He is obsessed that the lens has to have a 1.5 magnification. I have been looking around on the macro section and I do notice that a lot of the shots are from Canon gear, he is particularly interested in the extreme closeups of fly/bugs eyes, etc.
So what is everyones honest opinion, as a general rule with regards to macro are Canons macro lenses better than nikon macro lenses or is it pretty much the same?
Thanks
Clarke.