- Messages
- 2,070
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I need some advice here. I sold my 1DmkIV and 70-200 f.28 IS mkII after getting a but frustrated with my photography and struggling to find out how to break into the world of making some money from it. The photography bug has bitten again as I feared it might and I would like to get back in and try and make a proper go of it this time. The money from the above sales is now invested in some serious video cameras and equipment as that will be the main focus of my business, but with photography as a second income if it's possible.
So here is the problem. At present I have an ABSOLUTE max budget of around £3000 but could maybe push to £3500 (when I say max I really mean it).
However I still have my 24-70 L and 17-40 L sat at home looking sad because I can't use them without a body.
What would be the best use of the money would you say? I see it as a few options but I don't know which is best. Ideally I would want to end up with the "holy trinity" of lenses I had before - 17-40, 24-70, 70-200 (or their equivalents on FF or 1.6x sensors).
I would maybe be looking more in invest in something that would stand me in good stead if I ended up making a partial career out of this rather than something that will need upgrading soon.
1) Get another mkIV
Pros - Would be sorted with body. I loved the one I had.
Cons - Blows all budget and no long lens for now (but could save between now and Christmas for another 70-200).
2) Get a 5DmkII
Pros - Less that mkIV so more cash to invest in longer lens.
Cons - AF is a concern. Two areas of interest are aviation an sports. Only 5 fps might be too slow. Going FF means 24-70 might be too short and would need over 200mm on long end.
3) Get a 7D
Pros - Better AF than 5D
Cons - 1.6x crop also makes currents lenses a bit tricky. 24-70 I think I would find too long for general use. Not such good hight ISO for sports etc. Not a dedicated "pro" body.
4) Get a Nikon D700.
Pros - Better AF than 5D plus 8 fps with grip.
Cons - Would have to change all lenses and learn Nikons way of operating.
Any advice on this very much appreciated.
So here is the problem. At present I have an ABSOLUTE max budget of around £3000 but could maybe push to £3500 (when I say max I really mean it).
However I still have my 24-70 L and 17-40 L sat at home looking sad because I can't use them without a body.
What would be the best use of the money would you say? I see it as a few options but I don't know which is best. Ideally I would want to end up with the "holy trinity" of lenses I had before - 17-40, 24-70, 70-200 (or their equivalents on FF or 1.6x sensors).
I would maybe be looking more in invest in something that would stand me in good stead if I ended up making a partial career out of this rather than something that will need upgrading soon.
1) Get another mkIV
Pros - Would be sorted with body. I loved the one I had.
Cons - Blows all budget and no long lens for now (but could save between now and Christmas for another 70-200).
2) Get a 5DmkII
Pros - Less that mkIV so more cash to invest in longer lens.
Cons - AF is a concern. Two areas of interest are aviation an sports. Only 5 fps might be too slow. Going FF means 24-70 might be too short and would need over 200mm on long end.
3) Get a 7D
Pros - Better AF than 5D
Cons - 1.6x crop also makes currents lenses a bit tricky. 24-70 I think I would find too long for general use. Not such good hight ISO for sports etc. Not a dedicated "pro" body.
4) Get a Nikon D700.
Pros - Better AF than 5D plus 8 fps with grip.
Cons - Would have to change all lenses and learn Nikons way of operating.
Any advice on this very much appreciated.
