- Messages
- 1,099
- Name
- Neil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
And, ranarama wants to send an invoice to someone he's never done any work for.![]()
Wedding photography should be paid for in full one month before the wedding. No money, no work.
And, ranarama wants to send an invoice to someone he's never done any work for.![]()
my only thought is if you can't afford to get married don't!

Not always quite as simple as that though - maybe they've been planning for a while and one (or both) of them recently lost their jobs?
Anybody who uses the term "credit crunch" deserves to be shot. People are starting to use it as a get out of jail free card for bad money management and borrowing money that they can't pay back :bang:
Yep and if enough people keep doing free weddings there will be a good few wedding togs joining them.
I doubt she getting the food, flower, cars, rings, dress for free, so why should she get free photos.
Anybody who uses the term "credit crunch" deserves to be shot. People are starting to use it as a get out of jail free card for bad money management and borrowing money that they can't pay back :bang:
And many people who use it have been genuinely affected by it. As said, don't be quick to judge.
Couldn't have put it better myselfyou guys are obviously a lot more clever than me!
you've somehow managed to suss out the brides whole personality and life story from a short paragraph.
I've heard of judging a book by its cover but you guys dont even have the ISBN number!
Thanks - me and husband have used it and we have no bad money management or borrowing that we can't pay back, he's been made redundant as there is no money or work in the construction industry. Don't tar everyone with the same brush![]()
ROFL - All I can say is I hope you're never in a position where you need people not to be quick to judge you
Hugh
Yep and if enough people keep doing free weddings there will be a good few wedding togs joining them.
I doubt she getting the food, flower, cars, rings, dress for free, so why should she get free photos.

Now can someone close this thread as it's long since ceased to be about the OP and largely a rant?

It doesn't mention the word free anywhere![]()
ranarama, she posted on a site, where assistants offer thier services free for experience with pro togs etc, so I dont think she is looking to pay !!
I'm in the construction industry too, self employed, so when it's quiet I get no money. There is indeed a definate lack of work at the moment, but I've always put a bit of money away to see me through times like this. If the trend continues in the construction industry I'll have to look at a different line of work. I am solely responsible for my own upkeep on this earth, I don't deserve any handouts or freebies, so in order to make sure that I can exist without going into poverty I have to put money away when it's available and live off it when it's not. If there are no jobs or no work out there, it's not for me to complain... whoever said that people should be guaranteed a job or a salary. When you are born, it's up to you to make your own way through life, this includes making money, doing whatever it takes to survive etc. So THAT's why it ****es me off when people start whinging about the "Credit Crunch"....
As have we but you still shouldn't generalise and I don't want to take this off topic.
I'll wager the vast majority of people who are winging about the "credit crunch" are the ones who remortgaged their houses, started collecting credit cards and spending money like it was going out of fashion during the not-too-long-ago boom. I don't feel sorry for any of them to be honest, you have to be in charge of your own fortune and your own future in this world and that includes protecting yourself against any difficulties that may arise. Credit crunch this, credit crunch that, whinge whinge whinge.... really boils my **** :bang:
So, I'm afraid I will be quick to judge, that's my perogative.![]()

Umm, what??
So only wealthy people can get married? Isn't that a bit harsh?
Good on her for showing initiative and trying to get more for her money, hopefully she also understands the risk that she's taking with the output . .
i'm going to bookmark this thread so i have something to nominate in 'the dumbest and most pointless thread' in the TPF awards 2009


What a load of crap! Whether you call it credit crunch, recession or whatever, it means there isn't as much money about so people have been put out of work. Those people now have less money therefore they have less to spend. Yes, people can put money aside but there are limits, especially in the current economic climate. Your "I'm alright Jack" attitude may make you feel smug but it also says a lot about you and your lack of compassion towards others. To keep this on topic, the bride in the OP is looking for a cheap photographer for her wedding because she doesn't want to spend money that she doesn't have, is that not something you are advocating?
Oh, and for the record, I was made redundant last year because of the credit crunch (Or whatever you want to call it). I didn't remortgage and I have no credit cards so please do not think you have the right to judge other people based on the very little or no knowledge you have of them.

It's been a good sense of entertainment this morning, purely for the way people blow everything out of proportion![]()

Outcome of thread = some people are selfish (and I don't just mean ROFL2K9 here).
It's been a good sense of entertainment this morning, purely for the way people blow everything out of proportion![]()
This country is suffering because people borrowed money they could not afford to payback.
This issue seems to be brought up every day by someone. From a brides point of view photographers are expensive and an easy part of the wedding to save money on. If a bride doesn't have the money to buy the quality and expertise of a fully established professional then why not advertise for a keen and willing amateur or professional wannabe. The day will be beneficial to both of them. I am shooting a wedding for a friend later this year, I've never done it before but I have assured the bride I will do my absolute best for her and she's happy with that as would a lot of brides will very little money.
On the contrary, I think it's a very good idea for the lady in the OP to try to get something as cheaply as possible, if not free, if she is struggling for money. It's something I tend to do when I'm buying something
My dismay lies in her use of "Credit Crunch" in her email, which obviosuly she is more than entitled to do.
In my opinion (and this is where people get confused and start claiming that I "don't have the right" etc. I DO have the right because freedom of speech and freedom of thought are still very much a reality) a lot people are currently all too eager to jump on the "Credit Crunch" bandwagon.
I personally know a lot of people who have complained about the "Credit Crunch" being the reason for their monetary problems but after speaking to them at length it's more than apparent that it's their own financial negligence that's got them into bother.
I'll be the first to admit that I don't have a lot of time for whingers and whiners when the very things they are whinging about is a result of their own actions. Of course there are genuine cases of hardship that are a result of other peoples' actions and I do have compassion for them, but as I mentioned in my earlier post, I'm making a generalisation based on the facts and information via other sources that I have encountered.
If you find my opinions to be "crap" then that's just fine. You too have the right to your opinion. It's a shame because most of the people I talk to have the same thought's about the subject as I do but when it comes to putting across their opinions they don't bother due to the "You can't say that" briggade hauling them over the coals.
How can you possibly base a generalisation on facts? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever, generalisations are based on assumptions, not facts.
I'm afraid it's your stament that makes no sense :nono:

a generalisation cannot be based purely on assumption as this would remain just an assumption.
Now you're getting it.![]()

:boxer:

Now I'm getting what? My generalisations, if you read my posts were based on facts known to me. It's not my fault you didn't know what a generalisation actually is.... at least you've learnt something new today :razz:
:boxer:
*tiptoes out of the room*