1. Eyon

    Eyon

    Messages:
    101
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I've a photo which I'm really happy with and I'd love to get it printed, taken 2-3 days ago when there was that great sunset we had in London (and I assume everywhere else). The bad thing is that there is an amount of camera shake which shows when opened at 100%, though fresh out of a D850 full size is pretty huge!

    The image is cropped to 8238x4119 pixels and I've attached a 100% image of the image in its worst area. If I were to have this printed at say, 100x50cm, would this amount of shake be significantly noticeable from average viewing distances?

    I've never printed, would DPI output affect the way shake may appear?

    It's to be hung on my own wall, not sold or displayed, so my standards are lower, but am I on to a lost cause?

    ThamesShake.jpg



    ThamesSunsetShake.jpg
     
  2. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    3,108
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    100x50 = roughly 800ppcm which is roughly 320ppi

    Ppi will certainly not be the issue here. It will be more about the fact that it's blurred. You'll be able to see the blur in all it's high resolution glory :)

    "Significantly noticeable" is massively subjective. I'd probably say that if you're asking, then it bothers you thus it will bother you on the wall. I doubt it will bother any non-photographer. Unfortunately, I am terrible at spotting tiny things which then drive me bonkers. If I went and spent a lot of money on a huge print I wasn't happy with, I'd likely be more unhappy that I'd spent a huge amount of money as well as taken a photo I wasn't happy with.

    Me: Get print, hang it, look at it and admire it from a distance. Frown. Move closer. Frown more. Get close. Frown even more. Friends laugh and point at me for getting my nose up. I shout at them. They say it looks fab. I point out blur. They shrug and say it's fine. I tell them what fine stands for. Friends go home.
    Don't be me. :)

    [Edit to get ds and ps round the right way]
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2018
    ChrisR, drounding and gremlin16 like this.
  3. Brazo

    Brazo

    Messages:
    2,576
    Name:
    Mark
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I would say yes you would notice it to some extent but and a big but it’s not an image that demands sharpness it’s quite surreal in a yellow brick road way and would have many soft parts even if a tripod had of been used so I’d say print it and don’t worry.
     
  4. gremlin16

    gremlin16

    Messages:
    1,795
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I’ve never met you, but if it were me, it would bug me.
     
    Harlequin565 likes this.
  5. Ste_S

    Ste_S

    Messages:
    352
    Edit My Images:
    No
    You're certainly not on a lost cause. That will print very well - just need to find a combo of size vs what's an acceptable level of shake at viewing distance for you.
    I'm sure it would look great at A3 size in a nice mount for example

    Interestingly I note from your Instagram you're a pilot and photograph from the air.
    Of the shots I've taken in the air I normally do it with a camera with IBIS. Whilst they're not as high a resolution as yours I've not noticed camera shake in the final image.
    Perhaps try a camera with IBIS in the future ?

    Edit - Scrub that - it's going to be speed you're going at that's going to cause the image to blur ? You need to fly the plane slower ;)
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2018
  6. Eyon

    Eyon

    Messages:
    101
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks all, I've just done a test print at 320dpi on my home inkjet, the light blurs are about 1mm in length in the foreground, I'm going to stick it where I will normally look at it and see how it looks from a viewing distance.

    I've only just bought this D850, I did consider the Z7 with the IBIS but the speed we move and even the best stabilisation in the world can't freeze a 600mph moving platform, it's basically high shutter speed or nothing I've learnt. I've also learnt that the 1/focal length rule really doesn't work with the D850, just too many pixels. Normally I'd shoot a minimum of 1/40 at 20mm but I had the camera put away, set to ISO64, f/1.4 on AP and it gave me the 1/30 shutter. I wasn't flying the aircraft (I was on the 3rd "jumpseat", otherwise I wouldn't be taking photos this low), but it was still a camera out, quick shot, camera away type photo, no time to do settings, compose, stabilise etc. If I were to do it again I'd have gone up to ISO 200 or so and 1/80-1/100, but hindsight is wonderful. I've got a sharp image in my library taken 1 second hand held, annoys me I couldn't do it for 1/30!
     
  7. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic

    Messages:
    5,600
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    make an a4 print. hold it in your hand and look at it at normal reading distance.
    If it looks ok so will a wall sized print.


    I would try using the photoshop antishake filter on it It might improve it or it might make it worse, but it is worth a go.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2018
  8. Graham W

    Graham W

    Messages:
    1,841
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  9. Brazo

    Brazo

    Messages:
    2,576
    Name:
    Mark
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Would suit the image well with a painterly feel.
     
  10. Graham W

    Graham W

    Messages:
    1,841
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes. And I understand they are more "Forgiving" to focus errors.
     
  11. TCR4x4

    TCR4x4 Wishes he had a couple more Inches

    Messages:
    7,905
    Name:
    Tom
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Why such low ISO? The d850 should be pretty spotless up to 1600
     
  12. Eyon

    Eyon

    Messages:
    101
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    As in the bit you quoted, this was an opportunistic shot, I was shooting earlier in bright light with the ISO at 64, if I had time to set up I'd have shot a higher ISO.

    I hadn't considered canvas, I was going to do a giclee print (probably epson semi gloss paper) with a foamex mount, hung on the wall with batons to create the floating look. Is there anywhere recommended for high quality canvas prints?
     
  13. Grumps1974

    Grumps1974

    Messages:
    1,354
    Name:
    Martin
    Edit My Images:
    No
    It is well worth you trying the shake sharpening filter in Photoshop. You may be very pleasantly surprised at how much it might improve the photo.

    I say might as in my experience it works very well in some photos and has no noticeable effects in others.

    Give it a try if you can.
     
  14. troutfisher

    troutfisher

    Messages:
    1,603
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    As you have image editing turned on I have had a quick play with the shake filter in PS

    [​IMG]
    It does look to be a bit of an improvement so it might be worth a try with the original
     
  15. andyscott

    andyscott

    Messages:
    1,921
    Name:
    Andrew
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    it looks horrendous with massive amount of artefact.
     
    Ste_S likes this.
  16. andyscott

    andyscott

    Messages:
    1,921
    Name:
    Andrew
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    If you want to print it, give it a whirl.

    If you love it, great.
     
  17. Grumps1974

    Grumps1974

    Messages:
    1,354
    Name:
    Martin
    Edit My Images:
    No
    There are several adjustments that can be made in the filter. One reduces artefacts. Might just need a bit more tweaking.
     
  18. ChrisR

    ChrisR

    Messages:
    8,440
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    @Tradecanvasprint on here seems to get a good rep, though I've never used them (yet). You get a discount, too.
     
    Tradecanvasprint likes this.
  19. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    3,108
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I don't mind running a test print off to you Ian (after all, you have a cool name :)). Would be happy to do you an A4 test print if you send me a sample at (for example) 14x28cm. You could resize down but it would be best to cut a section and print a full sized bit out. Probably the bit you're most worried about.

    I can do it on matt, baryta or canvas.
     
    Bebop likes this.
  20. GreenNinja67

    GreenNinja67

    Messages:
    3,612
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just call it miniature ICM.

    It's all the rage having blurry photos apparently.

    If you don't want to spend too much money on a canvas try www.my-picture.co.uk.

    Ships from Germany in under a week and I've not had a bad one yet.
     
  21. Eyon

    Eyon

    Messages:
    101
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks all, the prices on trade canvas print seem decent, I'll perhaps order one up from them.

    @Harlequin565 thanks for your kind offer. I've tried a 100% crop print on my home inkjet, not good quality of course, and it seems "okay". I've taken a few photos in the last day or two I'd also be tempted to print, so perhaps I'll get a few done. Also, I agree, cool name!
     
  22. ihasa

    ihasa

    Messages:
    185
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Might be worth trying Focus Magic to reduce the blur. And perhaps print a little smaller :)
     
  23. LongLensPhotography

    LongLensPhotography

    Messages:
    13,418
    Name:
    Truth Teller
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Print a small section at the same magnification. This would tell you without all the expense of a full print.

    My feeling is that there is too much blur. I have binned images for far less.
     
  24. Eyon

    Eyon

    Messages:
    101
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Forgot to update this thread! I ended up taking the plunge and ordering a print. 80x40cm from Trade Canvas Print.

    Turned out really nice! From a normal viewing distance the shake isn't a problem. Sadly the print is really dark, easily a stop darker than I expected from the image I exported. I assume this is because there is no backlighting like a monitor on a print.

    Perhaps I'll try again in the future, but for now I'm quite happy with it,
     
  25. LongLensPhotography

    LongLensPhotography

    Messages:
    13,418
    Name:
    Truth Teller
    Edit My Images:
    No
    It looks indeed very dark. When I tell you that most of you just ignore or laugh. The histogram is mostly on the far left edge (and some on the far right). Many of you probably have your monitors at or near 100% brightness and just ignore the histogram.
     
    nandbytes likes this.
  26. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,088
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yep this.

    I only just opened this thread and first thing that came to mind was not shake but that the print would turn out dark.

    Anyway too late to warn OP now but for next time something to keep in mind :)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice