- Messages
- 6,671
- Name
- Wail
- Edit My Images
- No
Everything needs to be kept in perspective!
Sure, the 18-70 AF-S doesn't stand a chance against the 24-70 AF-S; however, at £200 vs. £1,200 there are times when going with the cheaper makes more sense; also, the weight (or lack of it) has its' advantages.
I tend to avoid buying bodies in a kit format, unless absolutely unavoidable, or where the kit lens is something I'd like to have!
I bought this lens when I first moved into dSLR (2004) and bought myself a couple of D70. At the time I was mainly a Minolta SLR user, as I have been since 1979.
Eventually, I sold this lens in 2008, having used it happily for these years. The day after I sold it I realised what a stupid mistake I'd done. I went back to the store and bought it back.
Regretfully, it broke on me in 2009 and that's when I realised its' days were over. The cost of repair would be more than having to buy a used one! So, now it sits in my collection of "retired" gadgets.
Sure, the 18-70 AF-S doesn't stand a chance against the 24-70 AF-S; however, at £200 vs. £1,200 there are times when going with the cheaper makes more sense; also, the weight (or lack of it) has its' advantages.
I tend to avoid buying bodies in a kit format, unless absolutely unavoidable, or where the kit lens is something I'd like to have!
I bought this lens when I first moved into dSLR (2004) and bought myself a couple of D70. At the time I was mainly a Minolta SLR user, as I have been since 1979.
Eventually, I sold this lens in 2008, having used it happily for these years. The day after I sold it I realised what a stupid mistake I'd done. I went back to the store and bought it back.
Regretfully, it broke on me in 2009 and that's when I realised its' days were over. The cost of repair would be more than having to buy a used one! So, now it sits in my collection of "retired" gadgets.
