Are the older 100-400mm a darker 'off' white, browner tint compared to the newer whiter ones?
Or could it just be how some pictures are taken/lots of...muddy use?
As far as I am aware all the 100-400's have been then same colour, could be the processing ofthe shots you have seen or as you say they may have seen a lot of use.
All white L lenses are RAL9002 I believe, but like anything depending on use the pigment can change. Mine lives on a shelf so probably gets a bit of sunlight during the day so I would expect it to be a bit lighter then one thats been in a bag for all of eternity and only come out at night.
I've got the 70-200mm f4 L and the 300mm f4 L and they are different colours, both less than 1 year old. I was surprised how different they are when I got them out together for the first time.
I've got the 70-200mm f4 L and the 300mm f4 L and they are different colours, both less than 1 year old. I was surprised how different they are when I got them out together for the first time.
this may not help you but my MkIII extender is lighter/brighter white than the 100-400 or MkII extender. Possibly the later paint has changed I do not know
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.