I am looking at buying either the Canon 100mm f2.8 USM or the Canon 100mm f2.8L IS USM, my question is: Is the L version of this lens so much better to warrant the price difference? I know it has IS but would there be a marked IQ diffirence?
I had this desicion to make in the last two weeks, but I decided to go for the L lens.
The IS is very usefull to me, not so much for proper macro, but for other uses of the lens as I have shakey hands.
Up close, the IS isnt as good as I wish it could be, but it still helps I took this shot handheld, which Im sure I wouldnt have done without IS.
Thanks for the answers, I have also read and then read again but am struggling to select between the 2. I am thinking of the non IS purely on financial reasons.
Thanks for the answers, I have also read and then read again but am struggling to select between the 2. I am thinking of the non IS purely on financial reasons.
i had the non-L version of the 100mm macro. I had to sell it because I didn't really use it for macro work and more for portraits, for which there are better lenses out there.
basically, it is sharp. very sharp. lovely for portraits and not too heavy. if you don't need IS, then save a few quid.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.