Currently have the money is version of this lens and the focal length is great but I keep getting blurry images due to my hand shake. I do use a tripod for certain situations. Just wondering if the is version is better?
Same optics, just one has IS and one doesnt. I'm sure canon claim something crazy like 3 stops worth of IS, in reality it'l gain you between 1-2 stops.
Think the best I can get is 1/20 handheld at 35mm then it becomes a blur fest without a tripod. If it's windy then no chance. I have the 55-250 Canon with is and its brilliant.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.