- Messages
- 961
- Name
- Chris
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I was wondering if anyone has/had both and noticed a real difference in low light performance. I have been torn between upgrading to the 1D MKIV or just holding off to see what the next gen 1 series brings to the table. I'm very happy with the performance of the mkIII at the moment in all situations except going to silly iso levels (And not too impressed with the screen vs the 5dmkII).
Will the jump from the mkIII to 1D MKIV make a huge difference or should I hold off for the newer stuff coming later in the year?
I use my camera mostly for photojournalism, portraiture and a bit of equine/spots. The only time I feel the mkIII struggles is like I said, low light when I'm ramping up the iso to 3200 and even more so at "H" (6400).
Will the jump from the mkIII to 1D MKIV make a huge difference or should I hold off for the newer stuff coming later in the year?
I use my camera mostly for photojournalism, portraiture and a bit of equine/spots. The only time I feel the mkIII struggles is like I said, low light when I'm ramping up the iso to 3200 and even more so at "H" (6400).

