- Messages
- 3,435
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm primarily a sports photographer and currently looking for an additional camera body. The 7D looks really interesting so I had a play with one today in Jessops. I took along a 1DIII and 70-200 2.8 plus a memory card as well with the primary aim of seeing how well the 7D handled high ISO compared to the 1DIII. High ISO performance is really important when shooting under floodlights where I'm routinely at ISO2000 or more.
As an aside, the 7D feels very nice in the hand, and the buttons have that distinctive smooth precision of the 1DIII which is lovely.
These pics are quite tight crops, all of the same amount and position of each photo (note NOT the same number of pixels). Done in Lightroom by cropping into the centre of one image then syncing the crop across the other images to ensure the same size of frame is shown. Shots are RAW with no processing except Lightroom import then crop and export as 100% quality jpeg.
Here the 1DIII at ISO2000, f/2.8, 200mm and 1/4000th at 1078x720px. NOTE it is raining so you can see raindrops here and there on both these pics.
And the 7D at ISO2000, f2.8, 200mm and 1/3200th at 1437x960px
Looks like a win for the 1DIII to me at ISO2000.
And the 1DIII at ISO3200, f/2.8, 200mm and 1/640th at 1078x720px
And the 7D at ISO3200, f/2.8, 200mm, 1/640th at 1437x960px
Not as conclusive but the 1DIII again looks to have the upper hand.
Obviously the 7D has a smaller sensor (1.6x crop v 1.3x crop on the 1DIII) so the images appear more "zoomed in" on the 7D pics. Also the 7D pics have more pixels, however this is of zero advantage as if you want to crop in closer you get an even noisier shot.
You will be "closer" to the action though so may not need to crop on the 7D versus the same lens choice on the 1DIII.
Conclusion...the 7D is pretty good, but not good enough. I'd like to try one at the next floodlit rugby game I do to see it in action, especially focus speed & accuracy. In the meantime I'm waiting for the 1DIV or a 2nd hand 1DIII
.
Tobers
As an aside, the 7D feels very nice in the hand, and the buttons have that distinctive smooth precision of the 1DIII which is lovely.
These pics are quite tight crops, all of the same amount and position of each photo (note NOT the same number of pixels). Done in Lightroom by cropping into the centre of one image then syncing the crop across the other images to ensure the same size of frame is shown. Shots are RAW with no processing except Lightroom import then crop and export as 100% quality jpeg.
Here the 1DIII at ISO2000, f/2.8, 200mm and 1/4000th at 1078x720px. NOTE it is raining so you can see raindrops here and there on both these pics.
And the 7D at ISO2000, f2.8, 200mm and 1/3200th at 1437x960px
Looks like a win for the 1DIII to me at ISO2000.
And the 1DIII at ISO3200, f/2.8, 200mm and 1/640th at 1078x720px
And the 7D at ISO3200, f/2.8, 200mm, 1/640th at 1437x960px
Not as conclusive but the 1DIII again looks to have the upper hand.
Obviously the 7D has a smaller sensor (1.6x crop v 1.3x crop on the 1DIII) so the images appear more "zoomed in" on the 7D pics. Also the 7D pics have more pixels, however this is of zero advantage as if you want to crop in closer you get an even noisier shot.
You will be "closer" to the action though so may not need to crop on the 7D versus the same lens choice on the 1DIII.
Conclusion...the 7D is pretty good, but not good enough. I'd like to try one at the next floodlit rugby game I do to see it in action, especially focus speed & accuracy. In the meantime I'm waiting for the 1DIV or a 2nd hand 1DIII
Tobers