Hello All
Just after a few comments on the aging Canon 40D, I am so close to ordering a good condition camera body only.
I bought an Sony A100 a few months after they were released, used it for a few years collected a couple of extra lenses and various equipment, eventually I found I wasn't using it so much due to having to carry lots of equipment and hastle of changing lenses, I made the mistake (I realise now) of selling it and buying a bridge camera (Fujifilm s6800).
I am constantly finding limitations with the bridge camera, holding back creativity and controllability. I'm getting frustrated at times.
I know the 40d is old and in low light isn't the best, but as my last DSLR experience was with a Sony A100, I'm wondering if I would be pleasantly surprised at the 40d, I have three Eos lenses that I have just been given hence the decision for an old body only Eos.
Looking for people's comments on how the two cameras compare.
Just after a few comments on the aging Canon 40D, I am so close to ordering a good condition camera body only.
I bought an Sony A100 a few months after they were released, used it for a few years collected a couple of extra lenses and various equipment, eventually I found I wasn't using it so much due to having to carry lots of equipment and hastle of changing lenses, I made the mistake (I realise now) of selling it and buying a bridge camera (Fujifilm s6800).
I am constantly finding limitations with the bridge camera, holding back creativity and controllability. I'm getting frustrated at times.
I know the 40d is old and in low light isn't the best, but as my last DSLR experience was with a Sony A100, I'm wondering if I would be pleasantly surprised at the 40d, I have three Eos lenses that I have just been given hence the decision for an old body only Eos.
Looking for people's comments on how the two cameras compare.