I recently bought a Canon 600d, which i think is a great camera for the money, after 6 weeks of using it, it met with an accident, and was nonrecoverable from a river, along with my sigma 17-70 lens, to say i was miffed is an understatement. My insurance company will pay out so this has lightened the blow, but i am wondering if its worth upgrading the 600D, to the 60D, is there anything i would miss on the 600D, apart from the volume controls for video or is there more. I don't really use the video.
I know there is the faster burst rate and the 9 af points, but will i see any differences in pic quality. My lenses are, Canon 50mm f1.8. Tolkina 100mm marcro and Canon 70-200mm L f4 usm. Also what replacement lens, or stick with the siggy 17-70mm
Most of my pics are Landscapes.
I know there is the faster burst rate and the 9 af points, but will i see any differences in pic quality. My lenses are, Canon 50mm f1.8. Tolkina 100mm marcro and Canon 70-200mm L f4 usm. Also what replacement lens, or stick with the siggy 17-70mm
Most of my pics are Landscapes.
