- Messages
- 8,193
- Name
- Pat MacInnes
- Edit My Images
- Yes
We have a few of the consumer-grade 70-300mm IS USM lenses but one has just failed totally and needs replacing. I don't mind these lenses and the guy who will be using it doesn't mind also, but I'm just thinking about what alternatives there are that will be optically better.
We're talking £340 less the VAT, so somewhere in the region of £275, which is good value but I have my doubts about where this lenses sits in the market with regard to its actual performance.
Obviously, Tamron's latest VC 70-300mm is an option, as is the Sigma 70-300mm DG OS. Then there are the bigger guns like the 170-500mm f/5-6.3, which used can be had for around £400 and obviously offers more reach but at the sacrifice of a slower maximum aperture. Is it sharp at f/6.3 when zoomed to 500mm or is it too much lens crammed into a budget price?
One of the guys has just got a used 100-300mm f/4 Sigma, and it's brilliant, but they're not common and the 70-200mm f/4 USM is obviously a corker but lack the reach.
Opinions please
We're talking £340 less the VAT, so somewhere in the region of £275, which is good value but I have my doubts about where this lenses sits in the market with regard to its actual performance.
Obviously, Tamron's latest VC 70-300mm is an option, as is the Sigma 70-300mm DG OS. Then there are the bigger guns like the 170-500mm f/5-6.3, which used can be had for around £400 and obviously offers more reach but at the sacrifice of a slower maximum aperture. Is it sharp at f/6.3 when zoomed to 500mm or is it too much lens crammed into a budget price?
One of the guys has just got a used 100-300mm f/4 Sigma, and it's brilliant, but they're not common and the 70-200mm f/4 USM is obviously a corker but lack the reach.
Opinions please