Canon RF 14-35mm f4 L IS

The Weasel

The Weasel

Messages
1,254
Name
Andy
Edit My Images
No
Looking for a landscape lens for my R5mk2 and my heart is set on the RF 14-35 f4 L IS.

So...are there other alternatives in the same sort of price range that offers the same quality?...also I don't need a f2.8 which would be well out of my price range anyway.

If you can offer any insights that would be appreciated...if you can't then no worries.
 
Thanks @isobarik

I must admit to being totally sold on it...but thought I'd better ask for alternatives if there are any others that can come close.
 
I have the 15-35 and without doubt it’s one of the most versatile, and fun lenses I’ve ever owned. Use it all the time, if you don’t need 2.8, then the f4 is quite a bit lighter…. I played with both but decided on the f2.8.

I’d 100% recommend it. I suppose the other one to look at is the 24-105 f4 if you don’t need the ultra wide end.

Personally, I’d love to see a 20-70 f2.8, that would be a great compromise.
 
The Weasel said:
Looking for a landscape lens for my R5mk2 and my heart is set on the RF 14-35 f4 L IS.

So...are there other alternatives in the same sort of price range that offers the same quality?...also I don't need a f2.8 which would be well out of my price range anyway.

If you can offer any insights that would be appreciated...if you can't then no worries.
Click to expand...

Great landscapes with wide angle are not easy by any stretch, as I'm sure you know, just repeating that in case. Personally, I mostly use longer focal lengths for landscape. I do have ultra wide but only very specific situations.

One more option to throw in is the EF 16-35 f2.8 M3 which looks to be about the same price as the wider RF if you would like the 2.8 and don't need the 14mm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top