- Messages
- 23,200
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- No
Wasn't the problem of reciprocity failure something to do with strange, unpredictable colour casts?
Need I say more?
Yes, something like that, and I see what you mean
But it's more than just faffing about with reciprocity tables and a box or Wratten filters. In practice, it is impossible to calculate a long night time exposure; it's down to lots of trial and error. And even then it is very difficult with film, because of the delay in getting stuff processed.
Digital changes everything. Very long exposures is maybe an area to explore with digital that you just could not do with film. A bit like strobist flash is also new digital technique, which I find really interesting.
Both these techniques have particular exposure problems that are very hard to resolve when shooting film. How do you expose for a night sky when it's almost so dark that you can't see your nose? No exposure meter will even move off zero, so you have to take a guess, multiply it by a reciprocity correction factor from a Kodak manual, fit colour correction filters, re-adjust reciprocity after the filter factor, take pages of notes, spend hours bracketing exposures madly, then pack up and go process the film.
If you're lucky, you might have something there or there abouts, but when you go back to try it for real, everything has changed so it's back to guesswork again. This just isn't practical, so nobody bothered much, but now with digital you can rattle off a series of test exposures at ISO3200 almost in no time at all, get a very accurate fix on exposure, and bang off the real thing just a few minutes later. The same goes for strobist flash - impossible without instant replay of test results, adjust lights, re-test, change them a bit more etc until it's right. Takes no time at all.
This is new territory for digital photographers. Completely new picture taking situations and creative opportunities that were, from a practical perspective, impossible with film. I like that
