Don't really understand that.No2 will be almost black (2 stops underexposed). Even the first will have very dark and dominating rocks on the bottom. Personally, I think you have better ones in your collection to put on the wall.
Don't really understand that.
The second one would look rather dark, but a print should exactly match what you see on your screen.
If it doesn't then you are doing something wrong.
The problem I have with the images , is the foreground rocks is to much of the photo 50% of the image is far to much for foreground. is it a rock photo a pie or sky image . Plus theres just not enough interest in the sky
I agree that the second example is too dark and lacks shadow detail, but your comment was that it would be "almost black" as a print.It will not be *exactly* as you see on the screen, because screen is backlit and paper is not, and there are subtle differences between papers and colour gamut reproduction. Aside from that - what is the point printing something really dark unless it is for something as dark as a wine cellar to match the darkness? It will look dreadful in an airy room or an office, and not much better elsewhere.
The problem I have with the images , is the foreground rocks is to much of the photo 50% of the image is far to much for foreground. is it a rock photo a pie or sky image . Plus theres just not enough interest in the sky